Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Many-valued logic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Gödel logics ''G<sub>k</sub>'' and ''G''<sub>∞</sub> === In 1932 [[Kurt Gödel|Gödel]] defined<ref>{{cite journal | last = Gödel | first = Kurt | title = Zum intuitionistischen Aussagenkalkül | journal = Anzeiger der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien | date = 1932 | issue = 69 | pages = 65f }}</ref> a family <math>G_k</math> of many-valued logics, with finitely many truth values <math>0, \tfrac{1}{k - 1}, \tfrac{2}{k - 1}, \ldots, \tfrac{k - 2}{k - 1}, 1</math>, for example <math>G_3</math> has the truth values <math>0, \tfrac{1}{2}, 1</math> and <math>G_4</math> has <math>0, \tfrac{1}{3}, \tfrac{2}{3}, 1</math>. In a similar manner he defined a logic with infinitely many truth values, <math>G_\infty</math>, in which the truth values are all the [[real number]]s in the interval <math>[0, 1]</math>. The designated truth value in these logics is 1. The conjunction <math>\wedge</math> and the disjunction <math>\vee</math> are defined respectively as the [[minimum]] and [[maximum]] of the operands: : <math>\begin{align} u \wedge v &:= \min\{u, v\} \\ u \vee v &:= \max\{u, v\} \end{align}</math> Negation <math>\neg_G</math> and implication <math>\xrightarrow[G]{}</math> are defined as follows: : <math>\begin{align} \neg_G u &= \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if }u = 0 \\ 0, & \text{if }u > 0 \end{cases} \\[3pt] u \mathrel{\xrightarrow[G]{}} v &= \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if }u \leq v \\ v, & \text{if }u > v \end{cases} \end{align}</math> Gödel logics are completely axiomatisable, that is to say it is possible to define a logical calculus in which all tautologies are provable. The implication above is the unique [[Heyting implication]] defined by the fact that the suprema and minima operations form a complete lattice with an infinite distributive law, which defines a unique [[complete Heyting algebra]] structure on the lattice.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)