Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Non-analytic smooth function
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==A smooth function that is nowhere real analytic== [[File:Smooth non-analytic function.png|thumb|Approximation of the smooth-everywhere, but nowhere-analytic function mentioned here. This partial sum is taken from {{math|''k'' {{=}} 2<sup>0</sup>}} to 2<sup>500</sup>.|right]] A more [[Pathological (mathematics)|pathological]] example is an infinitely differentiable function which is not analytic ''at any point''. It can be constructed by means of a [[Fourier series]] as follows. Define for all <math>x \in \mathbb{R}</math> :<math>F(x):=\sum_{k\in \mathbb{N}} e^{-\sqrt{2^k}}\cos(2^k x)\ .</math> Since the series <math>\sum_{k\in \mathbb{N}} e^{-\sqrt{2^k}}{(2^k)}^n</math> converges for all <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>, this function is easily seen to be of class C<sup>β</sup>, by a standard inductive application of the [[Weierstrass M-test]] to demonstrate [[uniform convergence]] of each series of derivatives. We now show that <math>F(x)</math> is not analytic at any [[dyadic rational]] multiple of Ο, that is, at any <math>x := \pi \cdot p \cdot 2^{-q}</math> with <math>p \in \mathbb{Z}</math> and <math>q \in \mathbb{N}</math>. Since the sum of the first <math>q</math> terms is analytic, we need only consider <math>F_{>q}(x)</math>, the sum of the terms with <math>k>q</math>. For all orders of derivation <math>n = 2^m</math> with <math>m \in \mathbb{N}</math>, <math>m \geq 2</math> and <math>m > q/2</math> we have :<math>F_{>q}^{(n)}(x):=\sum_{k\in \mathbb{N}\atop k>q} e^{-\sqrt{2^k}} {(2^k)}^n\cos(2^k x) = \sum_{k\in \mathbb{N}\atop k>q} e^{-\sqrt{2^k}} {(2^k)}^n \ge e^{-n} n^{2n}\quad (\mathrm{as}\; n\to \infty)</math> where we used the fact that <math>\cos(2^k x) = 1</math> for all <math>2^k > 2^q</math>, and we bounded the first sum from below by the term with <math>2^k=2^{2m}=n^2</math>. As a consequence, at any such <math>x \in \mathbb{R}</math> :<math>\limsup_{n\to\infty} \left(\frac{|F_{>q}^{(n)}(x)|}{n!}\right)^{1/n}=+\infty\, ,</math> so that the [[radius of convergence]] of the [[Taylor series]] of <math>F_{>q}</math> at <math>x</math> is 0 by the [[Cauchy-Hadamard theorem#Statement of the theorem|Cauchy-Hadamard formula]]. Since the set of analyticity of a function is an open set, and since dyadic rationals are [[Dense set|dense]], we conclude that <math>F_{>q}</math>, and hence <math>F</math>, is nowhere analytic in <math>\mathbb{R}</math>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)