Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ontological commitment
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== References == {{Reflist |refs= <ref name=Azzouni> {{cite book|last=Azzouni|first=Jody|title=Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism|year=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford}} </ref> <ref name=Baker> This section is a slightly modified version of the discussion by {{cite encyclopedia |author=Baker, Alan |title=Simplicity |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition) |editor=Edward N. Zalta |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/simplicity/#OntPar |date=Feb 25, 2010}} </ref> <ref name=definition> {{cite book |title=The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgediction00audi |url-access=limited |edition=Paperback 2nd |page= [https://archive.org/details/cambridgediction00audi/page/n663 631] |chapter=Ontological commitment |isbn=0521637228 |editor=Robert Audi |year=1999}} A shortened version of that definition is as follows: :The '''ontological commitments''' of a theory are those things which occur in all the ''ontologies'' of that theory. To explain further, the [[ontology]] of a theory consists of the objects the theory makes use of. A dependence of a theory upon an object is indicated if the theory fails when the object is omitted. However, the ontology of a theory is not necessarily unique. A theory is '''ontologically committed''' to an object only if that object occurs in ''all'' the ontologies of that theory. A theory also can be ''ontologically committed'' to a class of objects if that class is populated (not necessarily by the same objects) in all its ontologies. </ref> <ref name=Dejnozka> Of course, this description is not understandable unless one knows what ''first-order existential quantifiers'' are and what is meant by saying they are ''bound''. An approachable discussion of these matters is found in {{cite book |author=Jan Dejnožka |chapter=Chapter 1: Introduction |title=The Ontology of the Analytic Tradition and Its Origins: Realism, Possibility, and Identity in Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, and Quine |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cI0d7Cgj0BAC&pg=PA1 |pages=1 ''ff'' |isbn=0822630532 |year=1996 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield }} </ref> <ref name=Fogelin> {{cite book |title=The Cambridge Companion to Quine |author=Robert J Fogelin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Kvw-n1JIXHkC&pg=PA36 |page=36 |isbn= 0521639492 |year=2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press}} </ref> <ref name=French> {{cite book |chapter=Quine's Ladder: Two and a half pages from the ''Philosophy of Logic'' |author= Marion David |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xZO_BJuSzq0C&pg=PA274 |pages=274 ''ff'' |isbn=978-1405191456 |year=2008 |title=Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Truth and its Deformities (Volume XXXII) |editor1=Peter A. French |editor2=Howard Wettstein |publisher= Wiley-Blackwell}} </ref> <ref name=Colyvan> {{cite book |title=The Indispensability of Mathematics |author=Mark Colyvan |chapter=§4.2 What is it to be indispensable? |pages=76 ''ff'' |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OBs-TSFopLkC&pg=PA76 |isbn=0198031440 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2001}} </ref> <ref name=Gibson> {{cite book |title=Naturalism, Reference and Ontology: Essays in Honor of Roger F. Gibson |chapter=Quine vs. Quine: Canonical notation, paraphrase, and regimentation |page=171 |author=Alex Ornstein |editor=Chase B Wrenn |isbn=978-1433102295 |year=2008 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7hv-twrMHUgC&pg=PA171 |publisher=Peter Lang Publishing, Inc}} </ref> <ref name=Glock> {{cite book |title=Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought, and Reality |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6gUY1YNf_qEC&pg=PA41 |pages=41–47 |chapter=§1: Ontological commitment and ontological parsimony |author=Hans-Johann Glock |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2004 |isbn=1139436732 }} </ref> <ref name=Guarino> {{cite book |chapter=Formal ontology and information systems |author=Nicola Guarino |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wf5p3_fUxacC&pg=PA3 |pages=3 ''ff'' |title=Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the First International Conference (FIOS'98), June 6–8, Trento, Italy |year=1998 |isbn= 9051993994 |publisher=IOS Press}} </ref> <ref name=Heil> {{cite book|last=Heil|first=J.|title=From an ontological point of view|year=2003|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford}} </ref> <ref name=Henke> {{cite book |title=Handbook of Paleoanthropology: Primate evolution and human origins: Volume 2 |author=Kaila E Folinsbee|editor=Winfried Henke |chapter=Quantitative approaches to phylogenetics; §5.2: Fount of stability and confusion: A synopsis of parsimony in systematics |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vhoRdbTrjc8C&pg=PA168 |page=168 |isbn=978-3540324744 |year=2007 |publisher=Springer |display-authors=etal}} </ref> <ref name=Inwagen> {{cite journal |title=Meta-ontology |author=Peter Van Inwagen |url=http://andrewmbailey.com/pvi/Meta-ontology.pdf |journal=Erkenntnis |volume=48 |pages=233–250 |year=1998 |issue=2/3 |doi=10.1023/a:1005323618026}} </ref> <ref name=Inwagen2> {{cite book |title=Oxford Studies in Metaphysics : Volume 4 |chapter=Chapter 6: Quine's 1946 lecture on nominalism |pages=125 ''ff'' |isbn=978-0191562310 |author=Peter van Inwagen |publisher=Oxford University Press |year= 2008 |editor=Dean Zimmerman |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kivYOG_0vmwC&pg=PA125 |quote=Quine has endorsed several closely related theses that I have referred to, collectively, as his "meta-ontology". These are...those of his theses that pertain to the topic "ontological commitment" or "ontic commitment".}} </ref> <ref name=Loux> {{cite book |title=The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics |author1=Michael J. Loux |author2=Dean W. Zimmerman |editor1=Michael J. Loux |editor2=Dean W. Zimmerman |chapter=Introduction |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cgVVvyQ4lIMC&pg=PR4 |isbn=0199284229 |publisher=Oxford Handbooks Online |year=2005}} </ref> <ref name=Peacock> {{cite journal|last=Peacock|first=Howard|title=Two Kinds of Ontological Commitment|journal=The Philosophical Quarterly|year=2011|volume=61|issue=242|pages=79–104|doi=10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.665.x}} </ref> <ref name=Putnam> See for example, {{cite book |title=Philosophy of Quine: General, reviews, and analytic/synthetic, Volume 1 |pages=252 ''ff'' |author=Hilary Putnam |chapter=The analytic and the synthetic |orig-year=1962 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=efvWNDajvs4C&pg=PA252 |editor=Dagfinn Fllesdal |isbn=0815337388 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2001}} </ref> <ref name=Quine0> {{cite book |author=Willard Van Orman Quine |year=1983 |title=Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist: And Other Essays |chapter=Chapter 22: Ontology and ideology revisited |pages=315 ''ff'' |isbn=0674030842 |publisher=Harvard University Press |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8cnG59X1ntQC&pg=PA315}} </ref> <ref name=Quine1> {{cite book |title=From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-philosophical Essays |author=Willard Van Orman Quine |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OalXwuw3MvMC&pg=PA20 |pages=20 ''ff'' |chapter=Chapter 2: Two dogmas of empiricism |isbn= 0674323513 |year=1980 |publisher=Harvard University Press |edition =2nd}} See [http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html this] </ref> <ref name=Quine2> {{cite journal |author=Quine, W. V. |year=1948 |title=On What There Is |journal= Review of Metaphysics |volume=2 |pages=21–38}} Reprinted in {{cite book |title=From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-philosophical Essays |publisher= Harvard University Press |year= 1980 |pages=1–19 |isbn=0674323513 |edition=2nd |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OalXwuw3MvMC&pg=PA1}} Online on [[s:On What There Is|Wikisource]]. </ref> <ref name=Quine3> {{cite journal |author=Quine, W. V.|year=1951 |title=On Carnap's views on ontology |journal= Philosophical Studies |volume=2 |issue=5 |pages=65–72 |doi=10.1007/bf02199422|s2cid=170241527 }} Reprinted in {{cite book |title=The Ways of Paradox |pages=[https://archive.org/details/waysofparadox00quin/page/203 203]–211 |author=Willard Van Orman Quine |url=https://archive.org/details/waysofparadox00quin |url-access=registration |isbn=0674948378 |chapter=Chapter 9: On Carnap's views on ontology |year=1976 |publisher=Harvard University Press |edition=2nd}} </ref> <ref name=QuineW> {{cite book |title=Theories and Things |author= Willard Van Quine |isbn=0674879260 |year=1981 |publisher=Harvard University Press |edition=3rd |pages=[https://archive.org/details/theoriesthings00quin/page/144 144]''ff'' |url=https://archive.org/details/theoriesthings00quin|url-access=registration }} Cited by Alan Baker. </ref> <ref name=Routledge> {{cite book |author=Alex Orenstein |title=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |pages=8 ''ff'' |chapter=Quine, Willard Van Orman |editor=Edward Craig |isbn= 0415073103 |year=1998 |volume=8}} See also [[Models of scientific inquiry#Choice of a theory|Choice of a theory]]. </ref> <ref name=Ryan> {{cite book |title=American Philosophy: An Encyclopedia |chapter=Analytic: Analytic/Synthetic |author=Frank X Ryan |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KmUTkreTEQsC&pg=PA36 |pages=36–39 |editor1=John Lachs |editor2=Robert B. Talisse |isbn=020349279X |publisher=Psychology Press |year=2004}} </ref> <ref name=Schafer> {{cite book |chapter=Invariance principles and the community of heirs |author=Burkhard Schäfer |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wf5p3_fUxacC&pg=PA108 |pages=108 ''ff'' |isbn=9051993994 |year=1998 |editor=N Guarino |title=Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference June 6-8, 1998, Trento, Italy|publisher=IOS Press }} </ref> <ref name=Schaffer> {{cite book |author=Jonathan Schaffer |author-link=Jonathan Schaffer |chapter=On What Grounds What Metametaphysics |title=Metametaphysics |url=http://www.jonathanschaffer.org/grounds.pdf |editor=Chalmers |editor2=Manley |editor3=Wasserman |isbn=978-0199546046 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2009 |pages=347–83 }} Reprinted by Philosopher’s Annual 29, eds. Grim, Charlow, Gallow, and Herold; also reprinted in Metaphysics: An Anthology, 2nd edition, eds. Kim, Korman, and Sosa (2011), 73-96: Blackwell.) Contains an analysis of Quine and proposes that questions of ''existence'' are not fundamental. </ref> <ref name=Schaffer1> {{cite web|last=Shaffer|first=Jonathan|title=Truthmaker Commitments|url=http://www.jonathanschaffer.org/commitment.pdf}} </ref> }}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)