Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Probability theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Measure-theoretic probability theory=== The utility of the measure-theoretic treatment of probability is that it unifies the discrete and the continuous cases, and makes the difference a question of which measure is used. Furthermore, it covers distributions that are neither discrete nor continuous nor mixtures of the two. An example of such distributions could be a mix of discrete and continuous distributions—for example, a random variable that is 0 with probability 1/2, and takes a random value from a normal distribution with probability 1/2. It can still be studied to some extent by considering it to have a PDF of <math>(\delta[x] + \varphi(x))/2</math>, where <math>\delta[x]</math> is the [[Dirac delta function]]. Other distributions may not even be a mix, for example, the [[Cantor distribution]] has no positive probability for any single point, neither does it have a density. The modern approach to probability theory solves these problems using [[measure theory]] to define the [[probability space]]: Given any set <math>\Omega\,</math> (also called {{em|sample space}}) and a [[sigma-algebra|σ-algebra]] <math>\mathcal{F}\,</math> on it, a [[measure (mathematics)|measure]] <math>P\,</math> defined on <math>\mathcal{F}\,</math> is called a {{em|probability measure}} if <math>P(\Omega)=1.\,</math> If <math>\mathcal{F}\,</math> is the [[Borel algebra|Borel σ-algebra]] on the set of real numbers, then there is a unique probability measure on <math>\mathcal{F}\,</math> for any CDF, and vice versa. The measure corresponding to a CDF is said to be {{em|induced}} by the CDF. This measure coincides with the pmf for discrete variables and PDF for continuous variables, making the measure-theoretic approach free of fallacies. The ''probability'' of a set <math>E\,</math> in the σ-algebra <math>\mathcal{F}\,</math> is defined as <!--the correct formulation; X has nothing to do with it--> :<math>P(E) = \int_{\omega\in E} \mu_F(d\omega)\,</math> where the integration is with respect to the measure <math>\mu_F\,</math> induced by <math>F\,.</math> Along with providing better understanding and unification of discrete and continuous probabilities, measure-theoretic treatment also allows us to work on probabilities outside <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math>, as in the theory of [[stochastic process]]es. For example, to study [[Brownian motion]], probability is defined on a space of functions. When it is convenient to work with a dominating measure, the [[Radon-Nikodym theorem]] is used to define a density as the Radon-Nikodym derivative of the probability distribution of interest with respect to this dominating measure. Discrete densities are usually defined as this derivative with respect to a [[counting measure]] over the set of all possible outcomes. Densities for [[absolutely continuous]] distributions are usually defined as this derivative with respect to the [[Lebesgue measure]]. If a theorem can be proved in this general setting, it holds for both discrete and continuous distributions as well as others; separate proofs are not required for discrete and continuous distributions.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)