Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Problem solving
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Engineering === When products or processes fail, problem solving techniques can be used to develop corrective actions that can be taken to prevent further [[failure]]s. Such techniques can also be applied to a product or process prior to an actual failure eventβto predict, analyze, and mitigate a potential problem in advance. Techniques such as [[failure mode and effects analysis]] can proactively reduce the likelihood of problems. In either the reactive or the proactive case, it is necessary to build a causal explanation through a process of diagnosis. In deriving an explanation of effects in terms of causes, [[Abductive reasoning|abduction]] generates new ideas or hypotheses (asking "how?"); [[Deductive reasoning|deduction]] evaluates and refines hypotheses based on other plausible premises (asking "why?"); and [[Inductive reasoning|induction]] justifies a hypothesis with empirical data (asking "how much?").<ref name="Staat">{{cite journal|last=Staat|first=Wim|title=On abduction, deduction, induction and the categories|journal=Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society|volume=29|number=2|year=1993|pages=225β237}}</ref> The objective of abduction is to determine which hypothesis or proposition to test, not which one to adopt or assert.<ref name="Sullivan">{{cite journal|last=Sullivan|first=Patrick F.|title=On Falsificationist Interpretations of Peirce|journal=Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society|volume=27|number=2|year=1991|pages=197β219}}</ref> In the [[Charles S. Peirce|Peircean]] logical system, the logic of abduction and deduction contribute to our conceptual understanding of a phenomenon, while the logic of induction adds quantitative details (empirical substantiation) to our conceptual knowledge.<ref name="Yu">{{cite conference|last=Ho|first=Yu Chong|title=Abduction? Deduction? Induction? Is There a Logic of Exploratory Data Analysis?|year=1994|conference=Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association|location=New Orleans, La.|url=https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED376173.pdf|access-date=2023-09-20|archive-date=2023-11-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231102041717/https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED376173.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Forensic engineering]] is an important technique of [[failure analysis]] that involves tracing product defects and flaws. Corrective action can then be taken to prevent further failures. Reverse engineering attempts to discover the original problem-solving logic used in developing a product by disassembling the product and developing a plausible pathway to creating and assembling its parts.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://litemind.com/problem-definition/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170621145314/https://litemind.com/problem-definition/|archive-date=2017-06-21|title=Einstein's Secret to Amazing Problem Solving (and 10 Specific Ways You Can Use It)|website=Litemind|language=en-US|access-date=2017-06-11|date=2008-11-04 |last1=Passuello |first1=Luciano }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)