Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Prothrombin time
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Factors determining accuracy=== [[Lupus anticoagulant]], a circulating inhibitor predisposing for thrombosis, may skew PT results, depending on the assay used.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Della Valle P, Crippa L, Garlando AM, etal |title=Interference of lupus anticoagulants in prothrombin time assays: implications for selection of adequate methods to optimize the management of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid-antibody syndrome |journal=Haematologica |volume=84 |issue=12 |pages=1065β74 |date=December 1999 |pmid=10586206 |url=https://www.haematologica.org/cgi/reprint/84/12/1065 |format=PDF |access-date=7 February 2022 |archive-date=2 October 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111002154117/http://www.haematologica.org/cgi/reprint/84/12/1065 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Variations between various thromboplastin preparations have in the past led to decreased accuracy of INR readings, and a 2005 study suggested that despite international calibration efforts (by INR) there were still statistically significant differences between various kits,<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Horsti J, Uppa H, Vilpo JA |title=Poor agreement among prothrombin time international normalized ratio methods: comparison of seven commercial reagents |journal=Clin. Chem. |volume=51 |issue=3 |pages=553β60 |date=March 2005 |pmid=15665046 |doi=10.1373/clinchem.2004.043836 |doi-access=free }}</ref> casting doubt on the long-term tenability of PT/INR as a measure for anticoagulant therapy.<ref name=Jackson>{{cite journal |vauthors=Jackson CM, Esnouf MP |title=Has the time arrived to replace the quick prothrombin time test for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy? |journal=Clin. Chem. |volume=51 |issue=3 |pages=483β5 |date=March 2005 |pmid=15738512 |doi=10.1373/clinchem.2004.045393 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Indeed, a new prothrombin time variant, the Fiix prothrombin time, intended solely for monitoring warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists has been invented<ref>Gudmundsdottir BR, Francis CW, Bjornsdottir AM, Nellbring M, Onundarson PT. Thromb Res. 2012 Oct;130(4):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Jan 4.PMID 22225856</ref> and recently become available as a manufactured test. The Fiix prothrombin time is only affected by reductions in factor II and/or factor X and this stabilizes the anticoagulant effect and appears to improve clinical outcome according to an investigator initiated randomized blinded clinical trial, The Fiix-trial.<ref>Onundarson PT, Francis CW, Indridason OS, Arnar DO, Bjornsson ES, Magnusson MK, Juliusson SJ, Jensdottir HM, Vidarsson B, Gunnarsson PS, Lund SH, Gudmundsdottir BR. Lancet Haematol. 2015 Jun;2(6):e231-40. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00073-3. Epub 2015 May 25. PMID 26688233 Clinical Trial.</ref> In this trial thromboembolism was reduced by 50% during long-term treatment and despite that bleeding was not increased.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)