Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Science and technology studies
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Material semiotics === {{see also|Feminist science and technology studies}} With methodology from ANT, feminist STS theorists built upon SCOT's theory of co-construction to explore the relationship between gender and technology, proposing one cannot exist separately from the other.<ref name=":1b"/> This approach suggests the material and social are not separate, reality being produced through interactions and studied through representations of those realities.<ref name=":1b"/> Building on [[Steve Woolgar]]'s boundary work on user configuration,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Woolgar |first=Steve |date=May 1990 |title=Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1990.tb03349.x |journal=The Sociological Review |volume=38 |issue=1_suppl |pages=58–99 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-954x.1990.tb03349.x |s2cid=145786443 |issn=0038-0261|url-access=subscription }}</ref> feminist critiques shifted the focus away from users of technology and science towards whether technology and science represent a fixed, unified reality.<ref>{{Citation |last=Wajcman |first=Judy |title=Feminist theories of technology |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990127.n9 |work=Handbook of Science and Technology Studies |year=1995 |pages=189–204 |place= |publisher=SAGE Publications Inc. |doi=10.4135/9781412990127.n9 |isbn=9780761924982 |access-date=14 April 2022|url-access=subscription }}</ref> According to this approach, identity could no longer be treated as causal in human interactions with technology as it cannot exist prior to that interaction, feminist STS researchers proposing a "double-constructivist" approach to account for this contradiction.<ref>Landström, Catharina {{Citation |title=Queering Feminist Technology Studies |date=11 September 2013 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203427415-35 |work=Women, Science, and Technology |pages=419–433 |publisher=Routledge |doi=10.4324/9780203427415-35 |isbn=978-0-203-42741-5 |access-date=2022-04-14|url-access=subscription }}</ref> [[John Law (sociologist)|John Law]] credits feminist STS scholars for contributing material-semiotic approaches to the broader discipline of STS, stating that research not only attempts to describe reality, but enacts it through the research process.<ref name=":1b"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)