Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sioux language
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Structure== === Phonology === See [[Lakota language#Phonology|Lakota language β Phonology]] and [[Dakota language#Phonology|Dakota language β Phonology]]. ===Morphology=== Dakota is an agglutinating language. It features suffixes, prefixes, and infixes. Each affix has a specific rule in Dakota. For example, the suffix βpi is added to the verb to mark the plurality of an animate subject.<ref name="Shaw1980">{{cite book |last1=Shaw |first1=P.A. |title=Theoretical issues in Dakota phonology and morphology |date=1980 |publisher=Garland Publishing, Inc. |location=New York |page=10}}</ref> "With respect to number agreement for objects, only animate objects are marked, and these by the verbal prefix wicha-."{{Sfn|Shaw|1980|p=11}} Also, there is no gender agreement in Dakota. Example of the use of ''βpi'':{{Sfn|Shaw|1980|p=12}} {{interlinear|indent=3 |ma-khata |I-hot |"I am hot"}} {{interlinear|indent=3 |khata-pi |{{no gloss|0}}-hot-PL |"they are hot"}} Example of the use of ''wicha-'' {{interlinear|indent=3 |wa-kte |{{no gloss|0}}-I-kill |"I kill him"}} {{interlinear|indent=3 |wicha-wa-kte |them-I-kill |"I kill them"}} Infixes are rare in Dakota, but do exist when a statement features predicates requiring two "patients". Example of infixing: {{interlinear|indent=3 |iye-checa β iye-ni-ma-checa |{to resemble} {} {I resemble you} |"you resemble me"}} {{interlinear|indent=3 |iskola β i-ni-ma-skola |{be as small as} {} {I am as small as you} |"you are as small as I"}} ===Syntax=== Dakota has subject/object/ verb (SOV) word order. Along the same line, the language also has postpositions. Examples of word order:<ref name="Shaw1980"/> {{interlinear|indent=3 |wichasta-g {wax aksica-g} kte |man-DET bear-DET kill |"the man killed the bear"}} {{interlinear|indent=3 |{wax aksicas-g} wichasta-g kte |bear-DET man-DET kill |"the bear killed the man"}} According to Shaw, word order exemplifies grammatical relations. In Dakota, the verb is the most important part of the sentence. There are many verb forms in Dakota, although they are "dichotomized into a stative-active classification, with the active verbs being further subcategorized as transitive or intransitive."{{Sfn|Shaw|1980|p=11}} Some examples of this are:{{Sfn|Shaw|1980|pp=11-12}} # stative: #*ma-khata "I am hot" (I-hot) #*ni-khata "you are hot" (you-hot) #*khata "he/she/it is hot" (0-hot) #*u-khata "we (you and I) are hot" (we-hot) #*u-khata-pi "we (excl. or pl) are hot" (we-hot-pl.) #*ni-khata-pi "you (pl.) are hot" (you-hot-pl.) #*khata-pi "they are hot" (0-hot-pl.) # active intransitive #*wa-hi "I arrive (coming)" (I-arrive) #*ya-hi "you arrive" (you-arrive) #*hi "he arrives" #*u-hi "we (you and I) arrive" #*u-hi-pi "we (excl. or pl.) arrive" #*ya-hi-pi "you (pl.) arrive" #*hi-pi they arrive" # active transitive #*wa-kte "I kill him" (0-I-kill) #*wicha-wa-kte "I kill them" (them-I-kill) #*chi-kte "I kill you" (I-you (portmanteau)- kill) #*ya-kte "you kill him" (0-you-kill) #*wicha-ya-kte "you kill them" (them- you-kill) #*wicha-ya-kte-pi "you (pl.) kill them" #*ma-ya-kte "you kill me" (me-you-kill) #*u-ya-kte-pi "you kill us" (we-you-kill-pl.) #*ma-ktea "he kills me" (0-me-kill-pl.) #*ni-kte-pi "they kill you" (0-you-kill-pl.) #*u-ni-kte-pi "we kill you" (we-you-kill-pl.) #*wicha-u-kte "we (you and I) kill them" (them-we-kill) The phonology, morphology, and syntax of Dakota are very complex. There are a number of broad rules that become more and more specific as they are more closely examined. The components of the language become somewhat confusing and more difficult to study as more sources are examined, as each scholar has a somewhat different opinion on the basic characteristics of the language.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)