Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Strategic voting
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Canada === The observed effect of [[Duverger's law]] in Canada is weaker than in other countries.<ref name="Duverger2">Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States, 2009, André Blais, Bernard Grofman, Shaun Bowler</ref> In the [[1999 Ontario general election|1999 Ontario provincial election]], strategic voting was encouraged by opponents of the [[Ontario Progressive Conservative Party|Progressive Conservative]] government of [[Mike Harris]]. This failed to unseat Harris but succeeded in suppressing the [[Ontario New Democratic Party]] vote to a historic low. In the [[2004 Canadian federal election|2004 federal election]], and to a lesser extent in the [[2006 Canadian federal election|2006 election]], strategic voting was a concern for the federal [[New Democratic Party]] (NDP). In the 2004 election, the governing Liberal Party was able to convince many New Democratic voters to vote Liberal to avoid a Conservative government.{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} In the 2006 elections, the Liberal Party attempted the same strategy, with Prime Minister [[Paul Martin]] asking New Democrats and Greens to vote for the Liberal Party to prevent a Conservative win. The New Democratic Party leader [[Jack Layton]] responded by asking voters to "lend" their votes to his party, suggesting that the Liberal Party was bound to lose the election regardless of strategic voting.{{Cn|date=May 2024}} This failed to prevent the Conservatives from winning the election, although they did not win a majority of seats.{{Cn|date=May 2024}} During the [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015 federal election]], strategic voting was used extensively against the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative]] government of [[Stephen Harper]], which had benefited from [[vote splitting]] among centrist and left-leaning parties in the [[2011 Canadian federal election|2011 election]].<ref>{{cite web |date=18 October 2015 |title=Strategic Voting Must Include Casting Your Ballot for the Green Party |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/ken-wu/strategetic-voting-green_b_8305938.html |newspaper=The Huffington Post}}</ref><ref>{{cite AV media |url=http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-october-15-2015-1.3271954/federal-election-2015-strategic-voters-challenge-democracy-1.3271971 |title=Federal Election 2015: Strategic voters challenge democracy |date=15 October 2015 |medium=Radio broadcast |publisher=[[CBC Radio]] |first1=Anna Maria |last1=Tremonti}}</ref> Following the landslide victory of the [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberals]] led by [[Justin Trudeau]] over Harper's Conservatives, experts argued that this dramatic increase in support for the Liberals at the expense of the NDP and [[Green Party of Canada|Green Party]] was partially due to strategic voting for Liberal candidates.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Press |first1=Jordan |date=20 October 2015 |title=Canada Election Result Numbers Show Canadians Voted Strategically: Experts |newspaper=Huffington Post |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/10/20/canada-election-results-strategic-voting_n_8343104.html}}</ref> In three weeks, 1.4 million voters switched from NDP to Liberal. In at least two closely-contested ridings, strategic voting websites obtained enough pledges to account for the victory margin of the Liberal candidate.<ref>{{cite news |first1=Ali |last1=Kashani |title=Proof That Trudeau Won Because Strategic Voting Works |date=22 October 2015 |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/ali-kashani/strategic-voting-justin-trudeau_b_8351796.html}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)