Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Universal service
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Providing service to all (1970s-present)== Historians of AT&T tend to hold that the modern concept of "Universal Service" has been essentially the same since the firm's foundation.<ref>{{cite book | last=Pool | first=Ithiel de Sola |author-link=Ithiel de Sola Pool| title=The Social Impact of the Telephone | publisher=Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press | publication-place=Cambridge, Mass. | date=1977 | isbn=978-0-262-16066-7 | page=}}</ref> While agreeing that Vail's coining of the term was clearly influential, other scholars have pointed to a significant shift in meaning connected to the [[Breakup of the Bell System]] where the meaning of "Universal Service" became less focused less on interconnection, and more on providing service to all.<ref>{{cite journal | last=John | first=Richard R. | title=Theodore N. Vail and the Civic Origins of Universal Service | journal=Business and Economic History | publisher=Cambridge University Press | volume=28 | issue=2 | year=1999 | issn=0894-6825 | jstor=23703321 | pages=71β81 | doi=10.7916/D8T74118 | access-date=2024-09-21|url=https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8T74118}}</ref> The 1975 report to congress by [[Eugene V. Rostow]] on behalf of [[AT&T]] was influential in offering a reinterpretation of the 1934 communications Act as defending the benefits of monopoly: not duplicating infrastructure and providing service to all.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Mueller | first=Milton | title=Universal service in telephone history | journal=Telecommunications Policy | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=17 | issue=5 | year=1993 | issn=0308-5961 | doi=10.1016/0308-5961(93)90050-d | pages=352β369|url=https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/imce-uploads/CITI/Working%20Papers/Working%20Papers%20U/Universal%20Service%20in%20Telephone%20History%20A%20Reconstruction.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite thesis|type=PhD| author=Joanne D. Eustis|title=AGENDA-SETTING THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE CASE | url=https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6babe75e-763e-4234-a825-3c4fc620a7ba/content | page=95|access-date=2024-09-15|date=2000-04-07|publisher=Virginia Tech}}</ref> The [[Bell System divestiture]] of 1984 dissolved the monopoly that inspired "Universal Service" and the FCC began to abandon rate regulation. Universal service, in the sense of aspiring to provide service to all was more explicitly codified by the [[Telecommunications Act of 1996]],<ref>[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/254- 47 U.S.C. Β§ 254] Cornell University Law Library</ref> even as it permitted expanded competition in the telecommunications field. The [[Federal Communications Commission]] is actively exploring universal service reform, and the place of universal service to the broadband communications environment.<ref>[http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/ FCC: Universal Service]</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)