Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Whitney embedding theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Sharper results== Although every {{mvar|n}}-manifold embeds in {{tmath|\R^{2n},}} one can frequently do better. Let {{math|''e''(''n'')}} denote the smallest integer so that all compact connected {{mvar|n}}-manifolds embed in {{tmath|\R^{e(n)}.}} Whitney's strong embedding theorem states that {{math|''e''(''n'') ≤ 2''n''}}. For {{math|1=''n'' = 1, 2}} we have {{math|1=''e''(''n'') = 2''n''}}, as the [[circle]] and the [[Klein bottle]] show. More generally, for {{math|1=''n'' = 2<sup>''k''</sup>}} we have {{math|1=''e''(''n'') = 2''n''}}, as the {{math|2<sup>''k''</sup>}}-dimensional [[real projective space]] show. Whitney's result can be improved to {{math|''e''(''n'') ≤ 2''n'' − 1}} unless {{mvar|n}} is a power of 2. This is a result of [[André Haefliger]] and [[Morris Hirsch]] (for {{math|''n'' > 4}}) and [[C. T. C. Wall]] (for {{math|1=''n'' = 3}}); these authors used important preliminary results and particular cases proved by Hirsch, [[William S. Massey]], [[Sergei Novikov (mathematician)|Sergey Novikov]] and [[Vladimir Rokhlin (Soviet mathematician)|Vladimir Rokhlin]].<ref name=skopenkov2>See section 2 of Skopenkov (2008)</ref> At present the function {{mvar|e}} is not known in closed-form for all integers (compare to the [[Whitney immersion theorem]], where the analogous number is known). ===Restrictions on manifolds=== One can strengthen the results by putting additional restrictions on the manifold. For example, the [[n-sphere|{{mvar|n}}-sphere]] always embeds in {{tmath|\R^{n+1} }} – which is the best possible (closed {{mvar|n}}-manifolds cannot embed in {{tmath|\R^n}}). Any compact ''orientable'' surface and any compact surface ''with non-empty boundary'' embeds in {{tmath|\R^3,}} though any ''closed non-orientable'' surface needs {{tmath|\R^4.}} If {{mvar|N}} is a compact orientable {{mvar|n}}-dimensional manifold, then {{mvar|N}} embeds in {{tmath|\R^{2n-1} }} (for {{mvar|n}} not a power of 2 the orientability condition is superfluous). For {{mvar|n}} a power of 2 this is a result of [[André Haefliger]] and [[Morris Hirsch]] (for {{math|''n'' > 4}}), and Fuquan Fang (for {{math|1=''n'' = 4}}); these authors used important preliminary results proved by Jacques Boéchat and Haefliger, [[Simon Donaldson]], Hirsch and [[William S. Massey]].<ref name=skopenkov2/> Haefliger proved that if {{mvar|N}} is a compact {{mvar|n}}-dimensional [[n-connected|{{mvar|k}}-connected]] manifold, then {{mvar|N}} embeds in {{tmath|\R^{2n-k} }} provided {{math|2''k'' + 3 ≤ ''n''}}.<ref name=skopenkov2/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)