Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Answer Me!
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Controversy == In 1995, a complaint about issue no. 4 being sold at a [[Bellingham, Washington]] magazine store known as The Newsstand resulted in owners Ira Stohl and Kristina Hjelsand being tried on charges of distribution of [[obscenity]].<ref>{{Cite news | title = Question Put Before Court: Is Magazine Smut or Satire? | work = [[The New York Times]] | accessdate = 2012-06-11 | date = 1995-11-26 | url = https://www.nytimes.com/1995/11/26/us/question-put-before-court-is-magazine-smut-or-satire.html }}</ref> Charged with one felony count of promoting pornography, they faced a maximum sentence of five years in jail and a $10,000 fine. The defendants were found [[Acquittal|not guilty]].<ref>{{Cite news | last = Bjorhus, Jennifer | title = Not-Guilty Verdict In Bellingham Pornography Trial | work = [[Seattle Times]] | access-date = 2012-06-11 | date = 1996-02-02 | url = https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19960202/2312055/not-guilty-verdict-in-bellingham-pornography-trial----shopkeepers-knowledge-a-factor-says-jury }}</ref><ref name=foerstel>{{Cite book | publisher = Greenwood Press | isbn = 0-313-30245-6 | last = Foerstel, Herbert N. | title = Banned in the Media: A Reference Guide to Censorship in the Press, Motion Pictures, Broadcasting, and the Internet | year = 1998 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/bannedinmediaref0000foer }} [https://archive.org/details/bannedinmediaref0000foer/page/16 p 16].</ref> A later lawsuit against the City of Bellingham by Stohl and Hjelsand resulted in the City paying $1.3 million to the plaintiffs on the grounds of violation of [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] rights and infliction of emotional distress.<ref name=foerstel/><ref>{{Cite news | last = Schaefer, David | title = Whatcom 'Porn' Case Gets Vendor $1.3 Million | work = Seattle Times | access-date = 2012-06-11 | date = 1997-04-13 | url = https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19970413/2533669/whatcom-porn-case-gets-vendor-13-million----judgment-in-free--speech-trial-is-largest-civil-rights-award-in-states-history-lawyer-says }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)