Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Beeching cuts
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Disposals of land and structures === {{more citations needed section|date=August 2016}} [[File:Standlynch - The Beeching Belle - geograph.org.uk - 938812.jpg|thumb|A demolition train during the dismantling of the [[Salisbury and Dorset Junction Railway|Salisbury and Dorset Line]] in 1965]] [[File:Wednesbury Town railway station 2003.jpg|thumb|Both [[Wednesbury Town railway station]] and the [[South Staffordshire Railway]] were closed, and were still in ruins in 2003.]] Beeching's reports made no recommendations about the handling of land after closures. British Rail operated a policy of disposing of land that was surplus to requirements. Many bridges, cuttings and embankments have been removed and the land sold for development. Closed station buildings on remaining lines have often been demolished or sold for housing or other purposes. Increasing pressure on land use meant that protection of closed trackbeds, as in other countries, such as the US [[Rail Bank]] scheme, which holds former railway land for possible future use, was not seen to be practical.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.eastwestrail.org.uk/route/ |title=Route Selection β East West Rail<!-- Bot generated title --> |access-date=17 March 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130728034956/http://www.eastwestrail.org.uk/route/ |archive-date=28 July 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Many redundant structures from closed lines remain, such as bridges over other lines and drainage culverts. They often require maintenance as part of the rail infrastructure while providing no benefit. Critics of Beeching argue that the lack of recommendations on the handling of closed railway property demonstrates that the report was short-sighted. On the other hand, retaining a railway on these routes, which would obviously have increased maintenance costs, might not have earned enough to justify that greater cost. As demand for rail has grown since the 1990s, the failure to preserve the routes of closed lines, such as the one between Bedford and Cambridge, which was closed despite Beeching recommending its retention, has been criticised.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.eastwestrail.org.uk/route/ |title=Route Selection β East West Rail<!-- Bot generated title --> |access-date=17 March 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130728034956/http://www.eastwestrail.org.uk/route/ |archive-date=28 July 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)