Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Binding problem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Behavioral experiments ==== Dezfouli et al. investigated feature binding through two feature dimensions to disambiguate whether a specific combination of color and motion direction is perceived as bound or unbound. Two behaviorally relevant features, including color and motion belonging to the same object, are defined as the "bound" condition, whereas the "unbound" condition has features that belong to different objects. Local field potentials were recorded from the lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC) in monkeys and were monitored during different stimulus configurations. The findings suggest a neural representation of visual feature binding in 4 to 12 Hertz [[frequency bands]]. It is also suggested that transmission of binding information is relayed through different lPFC neural subpopulations. The data shows behavioral relevance of binding information that is linked to the animal's reaction time. This includes the involvement of the prefrontal cortex targeted by the dorsal and ventral visual streams in binding visual features from different dimensions (color and motion).<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Parto Dezfouli|first1=Mohsen|last2=Schwedhelm|first2=Philipp|last3=Wibral|first3=Michael|last4=Treue|first4=Stefan|last5=Daliri|first5=Mohammad Reza|last6=Esghaei|first6=Moein|title=A neural correlate of visual feature binding in primate lateral prefrontal cortex|journal=NeuroImage|pages=117757|language=en|doi=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117757|date=1 April 2021|volume=229|pmid=33460801|s2cid=231607062|doi-access=free}}</ref> It is suggested that the visual feature binding consists of two different mechanisms in visual perception. One mechanism consists of agonistic familiarity of possible combinations of features integrating several temporal integration windows. It is speculated that this process is mediated by neural synchronization processes and temporal synchronization in the visual cortex. The second mechanism is mediated by familiarity with the stimulus and is provided by attentional top-down support from familiar objects.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bernhard|first1=Hommel|title=When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration|url=https://bernhard-hommel.eu/Integrating%20features%20and%20objects.pdf|website=Psychology Press|publisher=Leiden University Institute for Psychological Research, and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)