Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Centrality
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Degree centrality== {{Main|Degree (graph theory)}} [[File:Wp-01.png|thumb|505x505px|Examples of A) [[Betweenness centrality]], B) [[Closeness centrality]], C) [[Eigenvector centrality]], D) [[Degree centrality]], E) [[#Harmonic centrality|Harmonic centrality]] and F) [[Katz centrality]] of the same random geometric graph.]] Historically first and conceptually simplest is '''degree centrality''', which is defined as the number of links incident upon a node (i.e., the number of ties that a node has). The degree can be interpreted in terms of the immediate risk of a node for catching whatever is flowing through the network (such as a virus, or some information). In the case of a directed network (where ties have direction), we usually define two separate measures of degree centrality, namely [[indegree]] and [[outdegree]]. Accordingly, indegree is a count of the number of ties directed to the node and outdegree is the number of ties that the node directs to others. When ties are associated to some positive aspects such as friendship or collaboration, indegree is often interpreted as a form of popularity, and outdegree as gregariousness. The degree centrality of a vertex <math>v</math>, for a given graph <math>G:=(V,E)</math> with <math>|V|</math> vertices and <math>|E|</math> edges, is defined as :<math>C_D(v)= \deg(v)</math> Calculating degree centrality for all the nodes in a graph takes [[big theta|<math>\Theta(V^2)</math>]] in a [[dense matrix|dense]] [[adjacency matrix]] representation of the graph, and for edges takes <math>\Theta(E)</math> in a [[sparse matrix]] representation. The definition of centrality on the node level can be extended to the whole graph, in which case we are speaking of ''graph centralization''.<ref>Freeman, Linton C. "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification." Social networks 1.3 (1979): 215β239.</ref> Let <math>v*</math> be the node with highest degree centrality in <math>G</math>. Let <math>X:=(Y,Z)</math> be the <math>|Y|</math>-node connected graph that maximizes the following quantity (with <math>y*</math> being the node with highest degree centrality in <math>X</math>): :<math>H= \sum^{|Y|}_{j=1} [C_D(y*)-C_D(y_j)]</math> Correspondingly, the degree centralization of the graph <math>G</math> is as follows: :<math>C_D(G)= \frac{\sum^{|V|}_{i=1} [C_D(v*)-C_D(v_i)]}{H}</math> The value of <math>H</math> is maximized when the graph <math>X</math> contains one central node to which all other nodes are connected (a [[star graph]]), and in this case :<math>H=(n-1)\cdot((n-1)-1)=n^2-3n+2.</math> So, for any graph <math>G:=(V,E),</math> :<math>C_D(G)= \frac{\sum^{|V|}_{i=1} [C_D(v*)-C_D(v_i)] }{|V|^2-3|V|+2}</math> Also, a new extensive global measure for degree centrality named Tendency to Make Hub (TMH) defines as follows:<ref name="10.1038/s41598-021-81767-7"/> :<math>\text{TMH} = \frac{\sum^{|V|}_{i=1} \deg(v)^2 }{\sum^{|V|}_{i=1} \deg(v) }</math> where TMH increases by appearance of degree centrality in the network.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)