Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Chicken Run
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Reception == === Critical response === The review aggregator website [[Rotten Tomatoes]] reported {{a or an|{{RT data|score}}}} approval rating and an average rating of {{RT data|average}}, based on {{RT data|count}} reviews. The website's critics consensus reads: "''Chicken Run'' has all the charm of Nick Park's ''[[Wallace & Gromit]]'', and something for everybody. The voice acting is fabulous, the slapstick is brilliant, and the action sequences are spectacular."<ref>{{cite Rotten Tomatoes |id={{RT data|rtid|noprefix=y}} |type=m |title=Chicken Run |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151226013804/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/chicken_run/ |archive-date=26 December 2015 |url-status=live|access-date={{RT data|access date|df=dmy}}}}{{RT data|edit}}</ref> At [[Metacritic]] the film has a weighted average score of 88 out of 100, based on 34 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".<ref>{{cite Metacritic|id=chicken-run|type=movie|title=Chicken Run|accessdate=7 February 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110228202537/https://www.metacritic.com/movie/chicken-run |archive-date=28 February 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref> Audiences polled by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film an average grade of "A−" on an A+ to F scale.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |title= ''Chicken Run'' (2000) |publisher= [[CinemaScore]] |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181220122629/https://cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |archive-date= 20 December 2018 |access-date= 8 July 2019 }}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] of the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' gave three and a half stars out of four, writing: "So it truly is a matter of life and death for the chickens to escape from the Tweedy Chicken Farm in ''Chicken Run'', a magical new animated film that looks and sounds like no other. Like the otherwise completely different ''[[Babe (film)|Babe]]'', this is a movie that uses animals as surrogates for our hopes and fears, and as the chickens run through one failed escape attempt after another, the charm of the movie wins us over."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/chicken-run-2000|title=Chicken Run Movie Review & Film Summary (2000) – Roger Ebert|first=Roger|last=Ebert|website=www.rogerebert.com|access-date=5 November 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107015643/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/chicken-run-2000|archive-date=7 November 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> ''Chicken Run'' and its sequel have been noted for their depiction of [[feminism]],<ref name="bitch"/><ref name="rejects"/><ref name="queer">{{cite web |title=Judith Jack Halberstam. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham and London: Duke University Press. 224 pp. Paperback |url=https://www.gjss.org/sites/default/files/issues/chapters/bookreviews/Journal-09-02--13-Szczygielska.pdf |access-date=19 August 2022 |archive-date=23 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220623054944/http://www.gjss.org/sites/default/files/issues/chapters/bookreviews/Journal-09-02--13-Szczygielska.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="allegory">{{cite journal |last1=Meighoo |first1=Sean |title=The Function of HumAnimAllegory |journal=Humanities |date=22 January 2017 |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=2 |doi=10.3390/h6010002 |doi-access=free }}</ref> [[political revolution|revolution]],<ref name="bitch"/><ref name="rejects"/> [[Marxism]],<ref name="Dallas">{{cite web |title=Dallas Observer {{!}} dallasobserver.com {{!}} Film |url=https://www.dallasobserver.com/issues/2000-06-22/film2.html |access-date=3 September 2022 |date=21 February 2002|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020221101510/https://www.dallasobserver.com/issues/2000-06-22/film2.html |archive-date=21 February 2002 }}</ref><ref name="bitch">{{cite web |title=Revisiting "Chicken Run," the Film That Pecked out the Poultriarchy |url=https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/revisiting-chicken-run-labor-organizing |website=Bitch Media |access-date=3 September 2022 |archive-date=3 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220903013105/https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/revisiting-chicken-run-labor-organizing |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="comment">{{cite journal |id={{ProQuest|210265783}} |last1=Anderson |first1=John |title=Chicken Run |journal=Film Comment |location=New York |volume=36 |issue=4 |date=2000 |pages=77 }}</ref> [[veganism]]<ref name="guardian1">{{cite news|title= A vegan morality tale? Chicken Run sequel puts factory farming in spotlight|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/dec/10/a-vegan-morality-tale-chicken-run-sequel-puts-factory-farming-in-spotlight|date=10 December 2023|author=Catherine Shoard|newspaper=The Guardian |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231220023347/https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/dec/10/a-vegan-morality-tale-chicken-run-sequel-puts-factory-farming-in-spotlight|archivedate=20 December 2023}}</ref> and [[fascism]].<ref name="fascism">{{cite journal |last1=Strzelczyk |first1=Florentine |title=Fascism and Family Entertainment |journal=Quarterly Review of Film and Video |date=16 April 2008 |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=196–211 |doi=10.1080/10509200601091433 |s2cid=191494968 }}</ref> According to Florentine StrzeIczyk, ''Chicken Run'' points to the way that [[masculinity]] and [[femininity]] are mediated in popular film genres.<ref name="fascism" /> It also received attention for its [[Women in film#Pay and representation|female-led cast]]. [[Film School Rejects]] called the movie feminist, noting that "the stereotypical '[[Women's work|woman's work]]' of these female chickens (such as their [[sewing]] and [[knitting]]) is crucial in constructing their mechanism for escape and vital towards the [[political revolution|revolution]] itself."<ref name="rejects">{{cite web |last1=Zigler |first1=Brianna |title=The Revolutionary Spirit of 'Chicken Run' |url=https://filmschoolrejects.com/revolutionary-spirit-of-chicken-run/ |website=Film School Rejects |date=11 February 2019 |access-date=19 August 2022 |archive-date=19 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220819214023/https://filmschoolrejects.com/revolutionary-spirit-of-chicken-run/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Islamic Republic of Iran News Network]] argued it was a way to disguise [[Zionism]]<ref name=iran>{{cite web |title=Iranian TV Documentary Series Traces Zionist Themes in Western Movies: "Chicken Run" |url=https://www.memri.org/tv/iranian-tv-documentary-series-traces-zionist-themes-western-movies-chicken-run |website=MEMRI |access-date=3 September 2022 |archive-date=3 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220903013231/https://www.memri.org/tv/iranian-tv-documentary-series-traces-zionist-themes-western-movies-chicken-run |url-status=live }}</ref> and [[Western world|Western]] [[propaganda]].<ref name="queer"/><ref name="iran"/> === Box office === On opening weekend, the film grossed $17,506,162 for a $7,027 average from 2,491 theatres. Overall, the film placed second behind ''[[Me, Myself & Irene]]''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.screendaily.com/carrey-tops-us-box-office-chickens-in-at-two/402785.article|title=Carrey tops US box office, Chickens in at two|access-date=13 October 2022|archive-date=2 December 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221202164005/https://www.screendaily.com/carrey-tops-us-box-office-chickens-in-at-two/402785.article|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/2000W25/|title=Weekend Box Office Results for June 23–25, 2000|publisher=Box Office Mojo. IMDb.|access-date=13 June 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140602051458/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2000&wknd=25&p=.htm|archive-date=2 June 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> In its second weekend, the film held well as it slipped only 25% to $13,192,897 for a $4,627 average from expanding to 2,851 theatres and finishing in fourth place.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/2000W26/|title=Weekend Box Office Results for June 30 – July 2, 2000 |publisher=Box Office Mojo. IMdb.|access-date=26 June 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714192916/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2000&wknd=26&p=.htm|archive-date=14 July 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> The film's widest release was 2,953 theatres, after grossing $106,834,564 in the United States and Canada. In the United Kingdom, it was the third highest-grossing film of the year with a gross of $43 million.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|page=32|title=U.K.'s Top 10 in 2000|date=19 February 2001|edition=AFM 2001: Film Market Preview}}</ref> With an additional $75 million from other markets, it grossed $224,834,564 worldwide. Produced on an estimated budget of $42–45 million, the film was a huge box office hit. To date, it is still the [[List of highest-grossing animated films#Stop motion animation|highest grossing stop motion animated movie]]. === Accolades === {| class="wikitable sortable" ! Group ! Category (Recipient) ! Result |- | rowspan="3" | [[Annie Awards]]<ref>{{cite web|title=28th Annual Annie|url=https://annieawards.org/28th-annie-awards|publisher=Annie Awards|access-date=9 September 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130102053351/http://annieawards.org/28th-annie-awards|archive-date=2 January 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> | Outstanding Achievement in an Animated Theatrical Feature | {{nom}} |- | Outstanding Individual Achievement for Directing in an Animated Feature Production ([[Nick Park]] and [[Peter Lord]]) | {{nom}} |- | Outstanding Individual Achievement for Writing in an Animated Feature Production (Karey Kirkpatrick) | {{nom}} |- | rowspan="2" | [[British Academy Film Awards]]<ref>{{cite news|title=Bigger Better Baftas|url=https://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?nid=13704|access-date=9 September 2014|work=Empire|date=31 January 2001|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910195315/http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?nid=13704|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | Best British Film | {{nom}} |- | Best Visual Effects | {{nom}} |- | [[British Academy Children's Awards]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://awards.bafta.org/award/2000/childrens|title=Children's in 2000|website=[[British Academy of Film and Television Arts]]|accessdate=19 February 2023|archive-date=8 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230308212901/http://awards.bafta.org/award/2000/childrens|url-status=live}}</ref> | [[British Academy Children's Award for Feature Film|Feature Film]] | {{nom}} |- | [[6th Critics' Choice Awards|Broadcast Film Critics]]<ref>{{cite web|last1=Armstrong|first1=Mark|title=Broadcast Critics Eat Crowe|url=https://www.eonline.com/news/40898/broadcast-critics-eat-crowe|publisher=E! Online UK|access-date=9 September 2014|date=19 December 2000|archive-date=7 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141007011732/http://www.eonline.com/news/40898/broadcast-critics-eat-crowe|url-status=live}}</ref> | rowspan="2" | Best Animated Feature | {{won}} |- | [[Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics Association Awards 2000|Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics]]<ref>{{cite news|last1=Reifsteck|first1=Greg|title=Dallas crix pick 'Traffic'|url=https://variety.com/2001/film/news/dallas-crix-pick-traffic-1117791461/|access-date=9 September 2014|work=Variety|date=8 January 2001|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910195843/http://variety.com/2001/film/news/dallas-crix-pick-traffic-1117791461/|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | {{won}} |- | rowspan="3" | [[Empire Awards]] | Best British Director (Nick Park and Peter Lord) | {{nom}} |- | Best British Film | {{nom}} |- | Best Debut (Nick Park and Peter Lord) | {{nom}} |- | [[European Film Awards]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Billy aims to conquer Europe|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1013092.stm|work=BBC News|access-date=9 September 2014|date=8 November 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910200252/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1013092.stm|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | Best Film | {{nom}} |- | [[Florida Film Critics Circle Awards 2000|Florida Film Critics]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Traffic is Florida favourite|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1102080.stm|work=BBC News|access-date=9 September 2014|date=5 January 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910200158/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1102080.stm|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | Best Animated Feature | {{won}} |- | [[Genesis Awards]]<ref>{{cite web|title=FIRST LOOK: The News in Brief, February 27, 2001|url=https://www.eonline.com/news/41227/first-look-the-news-in-brief-february-27-2001|publisher=E! Online UK|access-date=9 September 2014|date=27 February 2001|archive-date=11 September 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140911082717/http://www.eonline.com/news/41227/first-look-the-news-in-brief-february-27-2001|url-status=live}}</ref> | Best Feature Film | {{won}} |- | [[Golden Globe Awards]]<ref>{{cite web|last1=DeMott|first1=Rick|title=Chicken Run Lays A Golden Globe Nom|url=https://www.awn.com/news/chicken-run-lays-golden-globe-nom|publisher=Animated World Network|access-date=9 September 2014|date=21 December 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140911002357/http://www.awn.com/news/chicken-run-lays-golden-globe-nom|archive-date=11 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy | {{nom}} |- | Kansas City Film Critics<ref>{{cite web|title=KCFCC Award Winners – 2000–09|date=14 December 2013|url=https://kcfcc.org/kcfcc-award-winners-2000-09/|publisher=Kansas City Film Critics Circle|access-date=9 September 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006143201/http://kcfcc.org/kcfcc-award-winners-2000-09/|archive-date=6 October 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | Best Animated Feature | {{won}} |- | Las Vegas Film Critics<ref>{{cite news|last1=Scherzer|first1=Barbara|title=Las Vegas critics fete 'Erin,' 'Gladiator'|url=https://variety.com/2000/film/news/las-vegas-critics-fete-erin-gladiator-1117790967/|access-date=9 September 2014|work=Variety|date=26 December 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910200229/http://variety.com/2000/film/news/las-vegas-critics-fete-erin-gladiator-1117790967/|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | Best Family Film | {{won}} |- | [[Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards 2000|Los Angeles Film Critics]]<ref>{{cite news|last1=King|first1=Susan|title='Crouching Tiger' Wins Top Prize from L.A. Critics|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-dec-17-me-1258-story.html|access-date=9 September 2014|work=Los Angeles Times|quote=17 December 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910201512/http://articles.latimes.com/2000/dec/17/local/me-1258|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | rowspan="4" | Best Animated Feature | {{won}} |- | [[National Board of Review Awards 2000|National Board of Review]]<ref>{{cite news|last1=King|first1=Susan|title='Quills' Named Best Film by National Board of Review|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-dec-07-ca-62250-story.html|access-date=9 September 2014|work=Los Angeles Times|date=7 December 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910215730/http://articles.latimes.com/2000/dec/07/entertainment/ca-62250|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | {{won}} |- | [[New York Film Critics Circle Awards 2000|New York Film Critics]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Traffic wows New York critics|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1070240.stm|work=BBC News|access-date=9 September 2014|date=14 December 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910200042/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1070240.stm|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | {{won}} |- | rowspan="3" | Phoenix Film Critics<ref>{{cite web|title=Flashes From the week of January 18, 2001|url=https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/flashes-6418963|publisher=Phoenix New Times|access-date=9 September 2014|date=18 January 2001|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910195246/http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/content/printVersion/168743/|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | {{won}} |- | Best Family Film | {{won}} |- | Best Original Score ([[John Powell (film composer)|John Powell]] and [[Harry Gregson-Williams]]) | {{nom}} |- | rowspan="2" | [[Satellite Awards 2000|Satellite Awards]]<ref>{{cite news|last1=Reifsteck|first1=Greg|title='Gladiator,' 'Traffic' lead Golden Sat noms|url=https://variety.com/2000/film/news/gladiator-traffic-lead-golden-sat-noms-1117790733/|access-date=9 September 2014|work=Variety|date=18 December 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910200226/http://variety.com/2000/film/news/gladiator-traffic-lead-golden-sat-noms-1117790733/|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Minotta|first1=Mauricio|title='Traffic,' 'Betty' Are Golden|work=Tickets to Movies in Theaters, Broadway Shows, London Theatre & More | Hollywood.com |url=https://www.hollywood.com/general/traffic-betty-are-golden-57166531/|publisher=Hollywood.com|access-date=9 September 2014|date=31 July 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910200133/http://www.hollywood.com/news/brief/313500/traffic-betty-are-golden|archive-date=10 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | Best Motion Picture—Animated or Mixed Media | {{won}} |- | Best Sound | {{nom}} |- | Southeastern Film Critics<ref>{{cite web|title=2000 SEFCA Best Films of the Year|url=http://www.sefca.org/a2000.html|publisher=Southeastern Film Critics Association|access-date=9 September 2014|url-status=usurped|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040613054846/http://www.sefca.org/a2000.html|archive-date=13 June 2004}}</ref> | Best Film | {{nom}} |}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)