Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Consistent life ethic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Abortion=== {{Abortion in the Catholic Church}} Bernardin considered opposition to abortion to be an integral part of the consistent life ethic. In a 1988 interview with [[National Catholic Register]], he stated, "I feel very, very strongly about the right to life of the unborn, the weakest and most vulnerable of human beings. I donβt see how you can subscribe to the consistent ethic and then vote for someone who feels that abortion is a 'basic right' of the individual. The consequence of that position would be an absence of legal protection for the unborn."<ref>{{Cite news |date=12 June 1988 |title=BERNARDIN: Chicago's Pastor on Consistency and the '88 Vote |work=National Catholic Register |url=https://www.ncregister.com/blog/bernardin-put-life-first |access-date=21 August 2022}}</ref> Many consistent life ethic adherents advocate for increased [[social support]] for parents in addition to legal protection for the unborn.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chandler |first=Michael Alison |date=19 January 2018 |title='Badass. Prolife. Feminist.' How the 'pro-life feminist' movement is straddling the March for Life and Women's March |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/01/19/this-weekend-many-members-of-the-growing-pro-life-feminist-movement-plan-to-attend-both-the-march-for-life-and-the-womens-march/ |access-date=21 August 2022}}</ref> Advocates for the consistent life ethic have reacted positively to the release of the landmark ''[[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization]]'' decision (2022), which overruled both ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' (1973) and ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'' (1992).<ref>{{Cite news |last=O'Loughlin |first=Michael J |date=24 June 2022 |title='We thank God today': Catholics react to the end of Roe v. Wade |work=America Magazine |url=https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2022/06/24/roe-overturned-catholic-reactions-243239 |access-date=22 August 2022}}</ref> According to Herb Geraghty of Rehumanize International, "Right now is clearly a moment for celebration, and for mourning the lives that have been lost in the last 50 years due to the ''Roe v. Wade'' decision."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Schermele |first=Zachary |date=29 June 2022 |title=For anti-abortion LGBTQ groups, Roe's reversal is a 'human rights victory' |work=NBC News |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/anti-abortion-lgbtq-groups-roes-reversal-human-rights-victory-rcna35716 |access-date=21 August 2022}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)