Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Daily Express
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Dunblane=== {{main|Sunday Express Dunblane controversy}} On 8 March 2009, the Scottish edition of the ''Sunday Express'' published a front-page article critical of survivors of the 1996 [[Dunblane massacre]], entitled "Anniversary Shame of Dunblane Survivors". The article criticised the 18-year-old survivors for posting "shocking blogs and photographs of themselves on the internet", revealing that they drank alcohol, made rude gestures and talked about their sex lives.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Luft|first1=Oliver|last2=Carrell|first2=Severin|date=23 March 2009|title=Scottish Sunday Express apologises for Dunblane survivors story|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/mar/23/scottish-sunday-express-dunblane-apology|access-date=3 February 2016|website=[[The Guardian]]|archive-date=20 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220044638/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/mar/23/scottish-sunday-express-dunblane-apology|url-status=live}}</ref> The article provoked complaints, leading to a front-page apology a [[fortnight]] later.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/90417|title=Dunblane: We're Sorry|work=Sunday Express|date=22 March 2009|access-date=16 March 2010|archive-date=25 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090325101003/http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/90417|url-status=dead}}</ref> The [[Press Complaints Commission]] described the article as a "serious error of judgement" and said, "Although the editor had taken steps to resolve the complaint, and rightly published an apology, the breach of the Code was so serious that no apology could remedy it".{{cn|date=February 2025}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)