Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Deductive reasoning
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Hypothetical syllogism ==== {{main|hypothetical syllogism}} A ''hypothetical [[syllogism]]'' is an inference that takes two conditional statements and forms a conclusion by combining the hypothesis of one statement with the conclusion of another. Here is the general form: # <math>P \rightarrow Q</math> # <math>Q \rightarrow R</math> # Therefore, <math>P \rightarrow R</math>. In there being a subformula in common between the two premises that does not occur in the consequence, this resembles syllogisms in [[term logic]], although it differs in that this subformula is a proposition whereas in Aristotelian logic, this common element is a term and not a proposition. The following is an example of an argument using a hypothetical syllogism: # If there had been a thunderstorm, it would have rained. # If it had rained, things would have gotten wet. # Thus, if there had been a thunderstorm, things would have gotten wet.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Morreau |first=Michael |year=2009 |title=The Hypothetical Syllogism |journal=Journal of Philosophical Logic |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=447β464 |doi=10.1007/s10992-008-9098-y |issn=0022-3611 |jstor=40344073 |s2cid=34804481}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)