Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Discussion group
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Advantages== *Advantages: the implementation of Google Groups comes with its own advantages. For diverse users, it provides the service of interpreting languages widely, which helps present a better way to communicate effectively with people in different countries. Considering of storage, one group member enjoys "100 megabytes (MB)" while there are no restrictions for the whole group. It delivers convenience for group members work on projects that need considerably more storage than normal files, for example, presentations.<ref>{{cite web|title=Group basics|url=https://www.facebook.com/help/162866443847527/|website=Facebook|accessdate=27 October 2014}}</ref> Studies conducted by Kushin and Kitchener indicates Facebook provide users in discussion groups with more opportunities to post content that has correlation with "social, political, or sporting issues".<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Steenkamp|first1=Marika|last2=Hyde-Clarke|first2=Nathalie|title=The use of Facebook for political commentary in South Africa|journal=Telematics and Informatics|date=2014|volume=31 | issue = 1 |pages=91β97|doi=10.1016/j.tele.2012.10.002}}<!--|accessdate=28 October 2014--></ref> For WhatsApp users, the communication service brings enjoyment to share ideas with comparatively low cost. Ideally, it enhanced the quality of communication regarding of its records saving, security and trustability.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Nikou|first1=Shahrokh|last2=Bouwman|first2=Harry|author-link2=Harry Bouwman|last3=de Reuver|first3=Mark |title=The potential of converged mobile telecommunication services: A conjoint analysis |journal=Info |date=2012|volume= 14|issue= 5|pages=21β35|doi=10.1108/14636691211256287}}<!--|accessdate=28 October 2014--></ref> *Information in Discussion groups are usually [[archive]]d. For example, [[Google]]'s ''Groups'' (formerly [[DejaNews]]) is an archive of Usenet articles trace back to 1981.<ref name="NewsDemon"/> Discussion group archives are sometimes an effective way to find an answer to very ambiguous questions.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)