Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Intellectual property in China
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Patent law=== {{Main|Patent law of China}} In 1950, the PRC issued ''Provisional Regulations on the Protection of Invention Rights and Patent Rights.''<ref name=":5" />{{Rp|pages=57–58}} The PRC's early regulations provided for inventors' patent rights, but these were abolished fairly quickly under the view that patent rights were incompatible with socialism.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=183}} China then followed the model of the Soviet Union's investor certificates, honorary titles that were granted to investors without remuneration.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=183}} Just prior to the [[Cultural Revolution]], China completely abolished its patent regulations.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|pages=17–18}} In 1984, China passed the ''Patent Law of the PRC'' to encourage invention-creation and to promote the development of science and technology.{{cn|date=May 2024}} The subsequent ''Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the PRC'' added clarification.{{cn|date=May 2024}} In addition to [[Inventions Patents|invention patents]] and [[design patent]]s, [[utility patents]] are available under Chinese law.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=140}} In cases of joint patentees, the default rule in China is that each patentee can grant nonexclusive license without the other joint patentees' consent.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=140}} Joint patentees can avoid application of this default rule by agreement, however.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=140}} As compared to the United States, China has more non-patentable matters.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=140}} Pharmaceuticals and chemicals were not patentable under the 1984 Patent Law, but became patentable after the law was amended in 1992.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=20}} A bilateral memorandum of understanding with the United States made this amendment to domestic law necessary.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=20}} China accepted this requirement because it would have ultimately been necessary in order for China to re-enter GATT.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=21}} The Patent Law was again amended in 2000 to ensure compliance with China's obligations under the TRIPS Agreement.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=20}} In 2008, amendments to the Patent Law added provisions on the protection of genetic resources.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|pages=96–97}} These amendments established a disclosure obligation for genetic resources, a domestic provision which developed from the positions China took in negotiating on this issue in the TRIPS Council.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=110}} 2010 ''Implementation Rules of the Patent Law'' define genetic resources as any material taken from a human, animal, plant, or microorganism containing genetically functioning units with actual or potential value.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|page=27}} China became the country filing the largest number of patents in 2011.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hu |first=Albert G.Z. |last2=Zhang |first2=Peng |last3=Zhao |first3=Lijing |date=January 2017 |title=China as number one? Evidence from China's most recent patenting surge |journal=[[Journal of Development Economics]] |language=en |volume=124 |pages=107–119 |doi=10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.09.004}}</ref> This increase resulted in part from government incentives to patent filers, outpacing China's actual R&D spending and labor productivity. Most design and utility patents, which enjoy a shorter protection period and are easier to obtain compared to invention patents, were not renewed after five years.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Yilun Chen |first=Lulu |date=2018-09-26 |title=China Claims More Patents Than Any Country—Most Are Worthless |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-26/china-claims-more-patents-than-any-country-most-are-worthless |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20200217015942/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-26/china-claims-more-patents-than-any-country-most-are-worthless |archive-date=17 February 2020 |access-date=2024-11-30 |work=[[Bloomberg News]] |language=en}}</ref> In 2020 the Chinese government began pushing for stricter standards in granting patents.<ref>{{Cite web |last=slangman |date=2022-08-30 |title=China sets new targets for high-value patents in ambitious five-year plan |url=https://www.mathys-squire.com/insights-and-events/news/china-sets-new-targets-for-high-value-patents-in-ambitious-five-year-plan/ |access-date=2024-12-03 |website=Mathys & Squire LLP |language=en-GB}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)