Editing Karl Korsch (section)

==Philosophical work==
Korsch was especially concerned that Marxist theory was losing its precision and validity – in the words of the day, becoming "vulgarized" – within the upper echelons of the various socialist organizations. His masterwork, ''Marxism and Philosophy'', is an attempt to re-establish the historic character of Marxism as the heir to [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]]. It commences with a quote from [[Vladimir Lenin]]'s ''On the Significance of Militant Materialism'': "We must organize a systematic study of the Hegelian dialectic from a materialist standpoint." Korsch's critique of the traditional bourgeois concept of progress in his work ''Karl Marx'' stressed that the development of material productive sources is not a natural result or a result of independent economic evolution and can be changed by man.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Korsch|first=Karl|title=Karl Marx|publisher=BRILL|year=2016|isbn=978-90-04-19395-6|location=Leiden|pages=151}}</ref> He maintained that the revolutionary transformation of the mode of production and labor is essential to realize a proletarian revolution.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Piccone|first=Paul|title=Italian Marxism|publisher=Univ of California Press|year=1983|isbn=0-520-04798-2|location=Berkeley|pages=187}}</ref>

In Korsch's formulation, Hegel represented at the level of ideas the real, material progressiveness of the [[bourgeoisie]]. Alongside the extinction of 'Hegelianism' around 1848, the bourgeoisie lost its claim to that progressive role in society, ceasing to be the [[universal class]]. Marx, in taking Hegel and transforming that philosophy into something new, in which the workers would be the progressive class, himself represented the moment at which the revolutionary baton materially passed from bourgeoisie to workers. To Korsch, the central idea of Marxian theory was what he termed "the principle of historical specification". This means to "comprehend all things social in terms of a definite historical epoch". (Korsch, ''Karl Marx'', p.&nbsp;24)  He emphasizes that Marx "deals with all categories of his economic and socio-historical research in that specific form and in that specific connection in which they appear in modern bourgeois society. He does not treat them as eternal categories." (op. cit., p.&nbsp;29f.) He was also noted for claiming that socialism must not confine itself to the "socialization of the means of production" and, instead, construct useful formula for the socialistic organization of the national economy.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Schmelzer|first=Albert|title=THE THREEFOLDING MOVEMENT, 1919: A History. Rudolf Steiner's Campaign For A Self-Governing, Self-Managing, Self-Educating Society|publisher=Rudolf Steiner Press|year=2017|isbn=978-1-85584-541-1|location=Forest Row|pages=25|language=en}}</ref>

Korsch's stance had ramifications which were unpalatable to the official Communist Party structure – not least, casting the Party's own ideological weaknesses as the only material explanation for the failure of the revolution. Published in 1923, ''Marxism and Philosophy'' was strongly opposed by Party faithful and other left-wing figures, including [[Karl Kautsky]] and [[Grigory Zinoviev]].<ref name=Kolakowski>{{cite book | last = Kołakowski | first = Leszek | author-link = Leszek Kołakowski | title = Main Currents of Marxism | publisher = W. W. Norton & Company| location = London | date = 2005  | page = 1034 | isbn = 978-0-393-32943-8 | ref=i harv }}</ref>  Zinoviev famously said of Korsch and his fellow critic Lukács, "If we get a few more of these Professors spinning out their theories, we shall be lost." Over the subsequent five years, the German Communist Party gradually purged all such dissenting voices. Korsch survived within a current known as the Resolute Lefts, until his expulsion in April 1926.<ref name=Kolakowski /> He remained a communist deputy to the Reichstag.