Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Lineweaver–Burk plot
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Shortcomings == The Lineweaver–Burk plot does a poor job of visualizing experimental error.<ref name=dowd>{{Cite journal|last1=Dowd|first1=John E.|last2=Riggs|first2=Douglas S.|date=February 1965|title=A Comparison of Estimates of Michaelis-Menten Kinetic Constants from Various Linear Transformations|journal=Journal of Biological Chemistry|volume=240|issue=2|pages=863–869|doi=10.1016/s0021-9258(17)45254-9|issn=0021-9258|doi-access=free}}</ref> Specifically, if the errors <math>\varepsilon (v)</math> have uniform standard errors, then those of <math>1/v</math> vary over a very wide range, as can be seen from the following example: : If <math>v = 1 \pm 0.1</math> then the range of <math>1/v</math> is 0.91–1.11, approximately 20% : If <math>v = 10 \pm 0.1</math> (same standard deviation) then the range of <math>1/v</math> is 0.0990–0.1001, approximately 1%. Lineweaver and Burk were aware of this problem, and after investigating the error distribution experimentally,<ref name=Ergeb>{{cite journal | journal = Ergebnisse der Enzymforschung | volume = 3 | pages = 23–56 | author = Burk, D. | title = Nitrogenase}}</ref> finding a uniform standard deviation in <math>v</math>, they consulted the eminent statistician [[W. Edwards Deming]].<ref>{{cite journal | author = Lineweaver H, Burk D, Deming, W E | journal = J. Amer. Chem. Soc. | volume = 56 | pages = 225–230 | title = The dissociation constant of nitrogen-nitrogenase in ''Azobacter'' | year = 1934 | doi = 10.1021/ja01316a071 }}</ref> In the light of his advice they used weights of <math>v^4</math> for fitting their <math>1/v</math>. This aspect of their paper has been almost universally ignored by people who refer to the "method of Lineweaver and Burk."{{Fact|date=April 2023}} The values measured at low <math>a</math>, and hence large values of <math>1/a</math> lead to points on the far right of the plot and have a large effect on the slope of the line, and thus in particular on the value of <math>K_\mathrm{m}</math>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)