Editing Mac OS X 10.0 (section)

== Reception ==
{{Expand section|date=January 2023|Media & end-user reception, as well as evolution of market share compared to Mac OS 9}}
The release of Mac OS X 10.0 saw mixed reviews. [[ZDNet]] called the new OS "underdone" due to poor performance, [[kernel panic]]s, with main applications such as Finder causing system freezes.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Somogyi |first1=Stephan |title=OS X is here. So now what? |url=http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010329/tc/os_x_is_here_so_now_what__1.html |website=Yahoo! News |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010417041857/http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010329/tc/os_x_is_here_so_now_what__1.html |archive-date=17 April 2001 |date=29 March 2001}}</ref> [[CNET]] rated Mac OS X 10.0, a 6 out of 10, calling it "more stable than previous Mac OSs", along with compliments on its UI, memory management and speed, but isn't "ready for the masses", due to issues such as the lack of native third-party applications for the platform, missing DVD playback and hard to use user interfaces.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Rizzo |first1=John |title=CNET review: Mac OS X |url=http://www.cnet.com/software/0-5211419-8-5235645-1.html |website=CNET Software |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010913055216/http://www.cnet.com/software/0-5211419-8-5235645-1.html |archive-date=13 Sep 2001 |date=24 Mar 2001}}</ref> [[David Pogue]] stated in a ''[[The New York Times|New York Times]]'' tech column that while he felt Mac OS X was better looking and easier to use than [[Mac OS 9]] with superior features and menus, it was not yet ready for the average user, as it was not as polished, with missing features such as CD burning (at launch), automated shutdown scheduling, Labels menu.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Sellers |first1=Dennis |title=Columnists: OS X gets one thumb up, one thumbs down |url=http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0103/30.osx.shtml |website=MacCentral Online |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010725205902/http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0103/30.osx.shtml |archive-date=25 Jul 2001 |date=30 Mar 2001}}</ref>