Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Majority rule
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Agenda manipulation === {{Main|McKelvey–Schofield chaos theorem}} If voter's preferences are defined over a multidimensional option space, then choosing options using pairwise majority rule is unstable. In most cases, there will be no [[Condorcet winner criterion|Condorcet winner]] and any option can be chosen through a sequence of votes, regardless of the original option. This means that adding more options and changing the order of votes ("agenda manipulation") can be used to arbitrarily pick the winner.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Cox |first1=Gary W. |author-link=Gary W. Cox |title=Positive Changes in Political Science |last2=Shepsle |first2=Kenneth A. |author-link2=Kenneth Shepsle |pages=20–23 |chapter=Majority Cycling and Agenda Manipulation: Richard McKelvey's Contributions and Legacy |date=2007 |publisher=University of Michigan Press |isbn=978-0-472-06986-6 |editor-last=Aldrich |editor-first=John Herbert |series=Analytical perspectives on politics |location=Ann Arbor, Michigan |editor-last2=Alt |editor-first2=James E. |editor-last3=Lupia |editor-first3=Arthur}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)