Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Mass comparison
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Sound symbolism and onomatopoeia ==== Proponents of mass comparison often neglect to exclude classes of words that are usually considered to be unreliable for proving linguistic relationships. For instance, Greenberg made no attempt to exclude [[onomatopoeic]] words from his data. Onomatopoeic words are often excluded from linguistic comparison, as similar-sounding onomatopoeic words can easily evolve in parallel. Though it is impossible to make a definite judgement as to whether a word is onomatopoeic, certain [[semantic field]]s, such as "blow" and "suck", show a cross-linguistic tendency to be onomatopoeic; making such a judgement may require deep analysis of a type that mass comparison makes difficult. Similarly, Greenberg neglected to exclude items affected by [[sound symbolism]], which often distorts the original shape of lexical items, from his data. Finally, "nursery words", such as [[Mama and papa|"mama" and "papa"]] lack evidential value in linguistic comparison, as they are usually thought to derive from the sounds [[infants]] make when beginning to [[language acquisition|acquire languages]]. Advocates of mass comparison often avoid taking sufficient care to exclude nursery words; one, [[Merritt Ruhlen]] has even attempted to downplay the problems inherent in using them in linguistic comparison.<ref name="Campbell and Poser 2008"/><ref name="Campbell 1997"/> The fact that many of [[indigenous languages of the Americas]] have pronouns that begin with [[nasal stops]], which Greenberg sees as evidence of common ancestry, may ultimately also be linked to early speech development; [[Algonquian languages|Algonquian]] specialist [[Ives Goddard]] notes that "A gesture equivalent to that used to articulate the sound ''n'' is the single most important voluntary muscular activity of a nursing infant".<ref>{{Cite book|chapter=Sapir's Comparative Method|last=Goddard|first=Ives|author-link=Ives Goddard|date=1986|series=Amsterdam Studies in the History and Theory of the Language Sciences|title=New perspectives in language, culture, and personality: Proceedings of the Edward Sapir Centenary Conference (Ottawa, 1-3 October 1984)|volume=41 |editor-last1=Cowan|editor-first1=William|editor-last2=Foster|editor-first2=Michael K.|editor-last3=Koerner|editor-first3=Konrad|page=202|location=Amsterdam|publisher=John Benjamins|doi=10.1075/sihols.41.09god|isbn=978-90-272-4522-9 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)