Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Network effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Market tipping === Network effects give rise to the potential outcome of market tipping, defined as "the tendency of one system to pull away from its rivals in popularity once it has gained an initial edge".<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Katz|first1=Michael L.|last2=Shapiro|first2=Carl|date=June 1994|title=Systems Competition and Network Effects|url=https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Fjep.8.2.93|journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives|language=en|volume=8|issue=2|pages=93β115|doi=10.1257/jep.8.2.93|issn=0895-3309|access-date=2023-02-04|archive-date=2022-12-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221205011224/https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Fjep.8.2.93|url-status=live}}</ref> Tipping results in a market in which only one good or service dominates and competition is stifled, and can result in a [[monopoly]]. This is because network effects tend to incentivise users to coordinate their adoption of a single product. Therefore, tipping can result in a natural form of market concentration in markets that display network effects.<ref>{{Cite book|last=1. Shapiro 2. Varian|first=1. Carl 2. Hal|title=Information Rules|publisher=Harvard Business School Press|year=1998|location=Boston}}</ref> However, the presence of network effects does not necessarily imply that a market will tip; the following additional conditions must be met: # The utility derived by users from network effects must exceed the utility they derive from differentiation # Users must have high costs of [[multihoming]] (i.e. adopting more than one competing networks) # Users must have high switching costs If any of these three conditions are not satisfied, the market may fail to tip and multiple products with significant market shares may coexist.<ref name=":4" /> One such example is the U.S. instant messaging market, which remained an oligopoly despite significant network effects. This can be attributed to the low multi-homing and switching costs faced by users. Market tipping does not imply permanent success in a given market. Competition can be reintroduced into the market due to shocks such as the development of new technologies. Additionally, if the price is raised above customers' willingness to pay, this may reverse market tipping.<ref name=":4" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)