Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Oil drop experiment
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Millikan's experiment as an example of psychological effects in scientific methodology== {{See also|Confirmation bias#Science and scientific research}} [[File:Electron charge measurements 1913-1951.png|thumb|A scatter plot of electron charge measurements as suggested by Feynman, using papers published from 1913–1951]] In a [[commencement address]] given at the [[California Institute of Technology]] (Caltech) in 1974 (and reprinted in ''[[Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!]]'' in 1985 as well as in ''[[The Pleasure of Finding Things Out]]'' in 1999), physicist [[Richard Feynman]] noted:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lockhaven.edu/~dsimanek/cargocul.htm |title=Cargo Cult Science |publisher=California Institute of Technology |access-date=22 February 2018 |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417060350/https://www.lockhaven.edu/~dsimanek/cargocul.htm |url-status=dead }} (adapted from the 1974 [https://www.caltech.edu/ California Institute of Technology] commencement address), ''[http://www.lockhaven.edu/~dsimanek/home.htm Donald Simanek's Pages] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210605154712/http://www.lockhaven.edu/~dsimanek/home.htm |date=2021-06-05 }}'', [http://www.lockhaven.edu/ Lock Haven University], rev. December 2017.</ref><ref name="FeynmanLeighton1997">{{cite book|last1=Feynman|first1=Richard Phillips|last2=Leighton|first2=Ralph|last3=Hutchings|first3=Edward|title="Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman!": adventures of a curious character|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7papZR4oVssC&pg=PA342|access-date=10 July 2010|date=1997-04-01|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|location=New York|isbn=978-0-393-31604-9|page=342}}</ref> {{blockquote| We have learned a lot from experience about how to handle some of the ways we fool ourselves. One example: Millikan measured the charge on an electron by an experiment with falling oil drops, and got an answer which we now know not to be quite right. It's a little bit off because he had the incorrect value for the viscosity of air. It's interesting to look at the history of measurements of the charge of an electron, after Millikan. If you plot them as a function of time, you find that one is a little bit bigger than Millikan's, and the next one's a little bit bigger than that, and the next one's a little bit bigger than that, until finally they settle down to a number which is higher. Why didn't they discover the new number was higher right away? It's a thing that scientists are ashamed of—this history—because it's apparent that people did things like this: When they got a number that was too high above Millikan's, they thought something must be wrong—and they would look for and find a reason why something might be wrong. When they got a number close to Millikan's value they didn't look so hard. And so they eliminated the numbers that were too far off, and did other things like that ...}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)