Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Old Japanese
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Vowels=== The Chinese characters chosen to write syllables with the Old Japanese vowel ''a'' suggest that it was an [[open vowel|open]] unrounded vowel {{IPA|/a/}}.{{sfn|Miyake|2003|pp=198–203}} The vowel ''u'' was a [[close back rounded vowel]] {{IPA|/u/}}, unlike the unrounded {{IPA|/ɯ/}} of Modern Standard Japanese.{{sfn|Miyake|2003|pp=207–211}} Several hypotheses have been advanced to explain the A/B distinctions made in {{tlit|ja|man'yōgana}}. The issue is hotly debated, and there is no consensus.{{sfn|Miyake|2003|p=62}} The traditional view, first advanced by [[Kyōsuke Kindaichi]] in 1938, is that there were eight pure vowels, with the type B vowels being more central than their type A counterparts.{{sfn|Miyake|2003|p=55}} Others, beginning in the 1930s but more commonly since the work of Roland Lange in 1968, have attributed the type A/B distinction to medial or final [[semivowel|glides]] {{IPA|/j/}} and {{IPA|/w/}}.{{sfn|Miyake|2003|pp=55–57}}{{sfn|Frellesvig|2010|p=32}} The [[diphthong]] proposals are often connected to hypotheses about pre-Old Japanese, but all exhibit an uneven distribution of glides.{{sfn|Frellesvig|2010|p=32}} {| class="wikitable" |+ Examples of reconstructions of type A/B distinctions{{sfn|Miyake|2003|p=62}} |- ! ''i<sub>1</sub>'' !! ''i<sub>2</sub>'' ! ''e<sub>1</sub>'' !! ''e<sub>2</sub>'' ! ''o<sub>1</sub>'' !! ''o<sub>2</sub>'' ! Author |- | {{IPA|i}} || {{IPA|wi}} || {{IPA|e}} || {{IPA|we}} || {{IPA|wo}} || {{IPA|o}} || Kikusawa (1935) |- | {{IPA|i}} || {{IPA|ï}} || {{IPA|e}} || {{IPA|ë}} || {{IPA|o}} || {{IPA|ö}} || Kindaichi (1938), Miller (1967) |- | {{IPA|i}} || {{IPA|ïj}} || {{IPA|e}} || {{IPA|əj}} || {{IPA|o}} || {{IPA|ə}} || Arisaka (1955) |- | {{IPA|ji}} || {{IPA|i}} || {{IPA|je}} || {{IPA|e}} || {{IPA|o}} || {{IPA|ɵ}} || Hattori (1958) |- | {{IPA|ji}} || {{IPA|i}} || {{IPA|je}} || {{IPA|e}} || {{IPA|wo}} || {{IPA|o}} || Lange (1968, 1973) |- | {{IPA|i}} || {{IPA|wi}} || {{IPA|je}} || {{IPA|e}} || {{IPA|wo}} || {{IPA|o}} || Unger (1977), Frellesvig and Whitman (2008) |- | {{IPA|i}} || {{IPA|ï}} || {{IPA|e}} || {{IPA|ɛ}} || {{IPA|o}} || {{IPA|ɵ}} || Ōno (1982) |- | {{IPA|i}} || {{IPA|ɨ}} || {{IPA|e}} || {{IPA|əj}} || {{IPA|o}} || {{IPA|ə}} || Miyake (2003) |} The distinction between ''mo<sub>1</sub>'' and ''mo<sub>2</sub>'' was seen only in ''Kojiki'' and vanished afterwards. The distribution of syllables suggests that there may have once been *''po<sub>1</sub>'', *''po<sub>2</sub>'', *''bo<sub>1</sub>'' and *''bo<sub>2</sub>''.{{sfn|Frellesvig|2010|p=30}} If that was true, a distinction was made between ''Co<sub>1</sub>'' and ''Co<sub>2</sub>'' for all consonants C except for ''w''. Some take that as evidence that ''Co<sub>1</sub>'' may have represented ''Cwo''.{{citation needed|date=September 2020}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)