Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Plautus
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Second Punic War and Macedonian War=== The [[Second Punic War]] occurred from 218 to 201 BC; its central event was Hannibal's invasion of Italy. M. Leigh has devoted an extensive chapter about Plautus and [[Hannibal]] in his 2004 book, ''Comedy and the Rise of Rome''. He says that "the plays themselves contain occasional references to the fact that the state is at arms...".<ref>M. Leigh. ''Comedy and the Rise of Rome.'' New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. p. 24</ref> One good example is a piece of verse from the ''Miles Gloriosus,'' the composition date of which is not clear but which is often placed in the last decade of the 3rd century BC.<ref>A. F. West. "On a Patriotic Passage in the Miles Gloriosus of Plautus," ''The American Journal of Philology'' 8.1(1887), p. 18.</ref> A. F. West believes that this is inserted commentary on the Second Punic War. In his article "On a Patriotic Passage in the ''Miles Gloriosus'' of Plautus", he states that the war "engrossed the Romans more than all other public interests combined".<ref>West, 24.</ref> The passage seems intended to rile up the audience, beginning with ''hostis tibi adesse'', or "the foe is near at hand".<ref>West, 26.</ref> At the time, the general [[Scipio Africanus]] wanted to confront Hannibal, a plan "strongly favored by the plebs".<ref>West, 28.</ref> Plautus apparently pushes for the plan to be approved by the senate, working his audience up with the thought of an enemy in close proximity and a call to outmaneuver him. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that Plautus, according to P. B. Harvey, was "willing to insert [into his plays] highly specific allusions comprehensible to the audience".<ref>P.B. Harvey. "Historical Topicality in Plautus," ''Classical World'' 79 (1986), pp. 297-304.</ref> M. Leigh writes in his chapter on Plautus and Hannibal that "the Plautus who emerges from this investigation is one whose comedies persistently touch the rawest nerves in the audience for whom he writes".<ref>Leigh, 26.</ref> Later, coming off the heels of the conflict with Hannibal, Rome was preparing to embark on another military mission, this time in Greece. While they would eventually move on [[Philip V of Macedon|Philip V]] in the [[Second Macedonian War]], there was considerable debate beforehand about the course Rome should take in this conflict. But starting this war would not be an easy task considering those recent struggles with Carthage—many Romans were too tired of conflict to think of embarking on another campaign. As W. M. Owens writes in his article "Plautus' ''Stichus'' and the Political Crisis of 200 B.C.", "There is evidence that antiwar feeling ran deep and persisted even after the war was approved."<ref>W. M. Owens. "Plautus' 'Stichus' and the Political Crisis of 200 B.C.," ''The American Journal of Philology'' 121.3 (2000), p. 388.</ref> Owens contends that Plautus was attempting to match the complex mood of the Roman audience riding the victory of the Second Punic War but facing the beginning of a new conflict.<ref>Owens, 386.</ref> For instance, the characters of the dutiful daughters and their father seem obsessed over the idea of ''officium'', the duty one has to do what is right. Their speech is littered with words such as ''pietas'' and ''aequus'', and they struggle to make their father fulfill his proper role.<ref>Owens, 392.</ref> The stock parasite in this play, Gelasimus, has a patron-client relationship with this family and offers to do any job in order to make ends meet; Owens puts forward that Plautus is portraying the economic hardship many Roman citizens were experiencing due to the cost of war.<ref>Owens, 395-396.</ref> With the repetition of responsibility to the desperation of the lower class, Plautus establishes himself firmly on the side of the average Roman citizen. While he makes no specific reference to the possible war with Greece or the previous war (that might be too dangerous), he does seem to push the message that the government should take care of its own people before attempting any other military actions.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)