Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ramesses V
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Smallpox==== One theory is that he may have suffered and subsequently died from [[smallpox]] (VARV), due to lesions found on his face. If true, he is thought to be one of the earliest known victims of the disease.<ref>[[Erik Hornung|Hornung, Erik]]; "The Pharaoh" [https://books.google.com/books?id=c2xMevXgotsC&dq=death+%22Ramesses+V%22+smallpox&pg=PA292 p. 292]. in ''The Egyptians'' (ed.) [[Sergio Donadoni]] and Robert Bianchi, University of Chicago Press, 1997.</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Hopkins|first=Donald R.|author-link=Donald Hopkins|url=https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/202495/WH_1980_May_p22-26_eng.pdf|title=Ramses V: earliest know victim?|journal=World Health|pages=22β26|date=May 1980}}</ref> {{Overly detailed|section|date=May 2020}} While a 2016 discovery has found that the shared ancestral form of modern smallpox dates back to 1580 AD, this study merely indicates that the strains of smallpox circulating at the time of smallpox eradication had a common ancestor in the late 16th century, specifically that "the VARV lineages eradicated during the 20th century had only been in existence for ~200 years, at a time of rapidly expanding human movement and population size in the face of increasingly widespread inoculation and vaccination." Indeed, they say merely about ancient cases of smallpox that "if they were indeed due to smallpox, these early cases were caused by virus lineages that were no longer circulating at the point of eradication in the 1970s."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Duggan|first1=Ana T.|last2=Perdomo|first2=Maria F.|last3=Piombino-Mascali|first3=Dario|last4=Marciniak|first4=Stephanie|last5=Poinar|first5=Debi|last6=Emery|first6=Matthew V.|last7=Buchmann|first7=Jan P.|last8=DuchΓͺne|first8=Sebastian|last9=Jankauskas|first9=Rimantas|last10=Humphreys|first10=Margaret|last11=Golding|first11=G. Brian|last12=Southon|first12=John|last13=Devault|first13=Alison|last14=Rouillard|first14=Jean-Marie|last15=Sahl|first15=Jason W.|last16=Dutour|first16=Olivier|last17=Hedman|first17=Klaus|last18=Sajantila|first18=Antti|last19=Smith|first19=Geoffrey L.|last20=Holmes|first20=Edward C.|last21=Poinar|first21=Hendrik N.|title=17th Century Variola Virus Reveals the Recent History of Smallpox|journal=Current Biology|date=19 December 2016|volume=26|issue=24|pages=3407β3412|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.061|pmid=27939314|pmc=5196022}}</ref> The advent of vaccination, or variolation in China and Japan during the middle ages, could have altered the relative presence of smallpox strains and diminished the presence of ancient strains.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/bt/smallpox/who/red-book/Chp%2006.pdf|title=Early Efforts at Control: Variolation, Vaccination, and Isolation and Quarantine|orig-year=2004|year=2006|chapter=6|page=245-275}}</ref> A 2015 review summarizing recent research into the question of smallpox evolution and divergence from its common ancestors suggests it is most likely that smallpox evolved 3000β4000 years ago in East Africa or India, which is not inherently contradicted by the study described<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Babkin|first1=Igor|last2=Babkina|first2=Irina|title=The Origin of the Variola Virus|journal=Viruses|date=10 March 2015|volume=7|issue=3|pages=1100β1112|doi=10.3390/v7031100|pmid=25763864|pmc=4379562|doi-access=free}}</ref> the latter of which contains descriptions of smallpox from before the first century AD at least. Finally, another genomic analysis places the evolution of smallpox at 16,000 years before present, and mentions Ramses V: "if the pustular eruption of Ramses V was from smallpox, it could represent a smallpox outbreak from imported cases... rather than regional endemic disease. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that only three mummies in that period had similar lesions."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Li|first1=Y.|last2=Carroll|first2=D. S.|last3=Gardner|first3=S. N.|last4=Walsh|first4=M. C.|last5=Vitalis|first5=E. A.|last6=Damon|first6=I. K.|title=On the origin of smallpox: Correlating variola phylogenics with historical smallpox records|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|date=27 September 2007|volume=104|issue=40|pages=15787β15792|doi=10.1073/pnas.0609268104|pmid=17901212|pmc=2000395|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>Forni et al., Microbial Genomics 2023;9:000932 {{doi|10.1099/mgen.0.000932}}.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)