Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sprouts (game)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Normal version=== ''[[Winning Ways for your Mathematical Plays]]'' reports that the 6-spot normal game was proved to be a win for the second player by Denis Mollison, with a hand-made analysis of 47 pages. It stood as the record for a long time, until the first computer analysis, which was done at [[Carnegie Mellon University]] in 1990 by [[David Applegate]], [[Guy Jacobson]], and [[Daniel Sleator]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sleator/papers/Sprouts.htm |title=David Applegate, Guy Jacobson, and Daniel Sleator, ''Computer Analysis of Sprouts'', 1991 |publisher=Cs.cmu.edu |access-date=2012-09-26}}</ref> They reached up to 11 spots with some of the best hardware available at the time. Applegate, Jacobson and Sleator observed a pattern in their results, and [[conjecture]]d that the first player has a winning strategy when the number of spots divided by six leaves a remainder of three, four, or five. This is a mathematical way of saying that the pattern displayed by the outcome in the table below repeats itself indefinitely, with a period of six spots. {| border="1" cellspacing="0" |- | '''Spots''' | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... |- | '''Normal Outcome'''  | Loss  | Loss  | Loss  | Win  | Win  | Win  | Loss  | Loss  | Loss  | Win  | Win  | Win  | ...  |} In 2001, Riccardo Focardi and Flamina Luccio described a method to prove by hand that the normal 7-spot game is a loss.<ref>{{cite web| first1 = Riccardo |last1 = Focardi | first2 = Flamina | last2 = Luccio | title = A new analysis technique for the Sprouts Game | date = 2001| citeseerx = 10.1.1.21.212|s2cid = 18947864 }}</ref> Then, the computation results were extended in 2006 by Josh Jordan up to 14 spots. In 2007, Julien Lemoine and Simon Viennot introduced an algorithm based on the concept of [[nimber]]s to accelerate the computation, reaching up to 32 spots.<ref>{{cite arXiv|first1=Lemoine|last1=Julien|first2= Viennot|last2=Simon|title=Computer analysis of Sprouts with nimbers|year=2010|eprint=1008.2320 |class=math.CO}}</ref> They have extended the computation up to 44 spots in 2011, and three isolated starting positions, with 46, 47 and 53 spots.<ref name="sproutsWiki">[http://sprouts.tuxfamily.org/wiki/doku.php?id=records Computation records of normal and misère Sprouts], Julien Lemoine and Simon Viennot web site</ref> The normal-play results so far are all consistent with the conjecture of Applegate, Jacobson, and Sleator.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)