Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Swept wing
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Sweep theory=== [[Sweep theory]] is an [[aeronautical engineering]] description of the behavior of airflow over a [[wing]] when the wing's leading edge encounters the airflow at an oblique angle. The development of sweep theory resulted in the swept wing design used by most modern jet aircraft, as this design performs more effectively at transonic and [[supersonic]] speeds. In its advanced form, sweep theory led to the experimental [[oblique wing]] concept. [[Adolf Busemann]] introduced the concept of the swept wing and presented this in 1935 at the Fifth [[Volta Conference]] in Rome.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11348315140095133548 | title=Google Scholar }}</ref> Sweep theory in general was a subject of development and investigation throughout the 1930s and 1940s, but the breakthrough mathematical definition of sweep theory is generally credited to [[NACA]]'s [[Robert Thomas Jones (engineer)|Robert T. Jones]] in 1945. Sweep theory builds on other wing lift theories. Lifting line theory describes lift generated by a straight wing (a wing in which the leading edge is perpendicular to the airflow). Weissinger theory describes the distribution of lift for a swept wing, but does not have the capability to include chordwise pressure distribution. There are other methods that do describe chordwise distributions, but they have other limitations. Jones' sweep theory provides a simple, comprehensive analysis of swept wing performance. An explanation of how the swept wing works was offered by [[Robert Thomas Jones (engineer)|Robert T. Jones]]: "Assume a wing is a cylinder of uniform airfoil cross-section, chord and thickness and is placed in an airstream at an angle of yaw β i.e., it is swept back. Now, even if the local speed of the air on the upper surface of the wing becomes supersonic, a shock wave cannot form there because it would have to be a sweptback shock β swept at the same angle as the wing β i.e., it would be an oblique shock. Such an oblique shock cannot form until the velocity component normal to it becomes supersonic."<ref>Sears, William Rees, ''Stories form a 20th-Century Life'', Parabolic Press, Inc., Stanford California, 1994</ref> To visualize the basic concept of simple sweep theory, consider a straight, non-swept wing of infinite length, which meets the airflow at a perpendicular angle. The resulting air pressure distribution is equivalent to the length of the wing's [[chord (aircraft)|chord]] (the distance from the leading edge to the trailing edge). If we were to begin to slide the wing sideways ([[spanwise]]), the sideways motion of the wing relative to the air would be added to the previously perpendicular airflow, resulting in an airflow over the wing at an angle to the leading edge. This angle results in airflow traveling a greater distance from leading edge to trailing edge, and thus the air pressure is distributed over a greater distance (and consequently lessened at any particular point on the surface). This scenario is identical to the airflow experienced by a swept wing as it travels through the air. The airflow over a swept wing encounters the wing at an angle. That angle can be broken down into two vectors, one perpendicular to the wing, and one parallel to the wing. The flow parallel to the wing has no effect on it, and since the perpendicular vector is shorter (meaning slower) than the actual airflow, it consequently exerts less pressure on the wing. In other words, the wing experiences airflow that is slower - and at lower pressures - than the actual speed of the aircraft. One of the factors that must be taken into account when designing a high-speed wing is [[compressibility]], which is the effect that acts upon a wing as it approaches and passes through the [[speed of sound]]. The significant negative effects of compressibility made it a prime issue with aeronautical engineers. Sweep theory helps mitigate the effects of compressibility in transonic and supersonic aircraft because of the reduced pressures. This allows the [[mach number]] of an aircraft to be higher than that actually experienced by the wing. There is also a negative aspect to sweep theory. The lift produced by a wing is directly related to the speed of the air over the wing. Since the airflow speed experienced by a swept wing is lower than what the actual aircraft speed is, this becomes a problem during slow-flight phases, such as takeoff and landing. There have been various ways of addressing the problem, including the [[variable-incidence wing]] design on the [[Vought F-8 Crusader]],<ref name="Bjorkman, Eileen 2015, p.62">Bjorkman, Eileen. Gunfighters. Air & Space, November 2015. p. 62.</ref> and [[Variable-sweep wing|swing wings]] on aircraft such as the [[Grumman F-14 Tomcat|F-14]], [[General Dynamics F-111|F-111]], and the [[Panavia Tornado]].<ref name="Woolridge">Woolridge, Capt. E.T., ed. ''Into the Jet Age: Conflict and Change in Naval Aviation 1945β1975, an Oral History''. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1995. {{ISBN|1-55750-932-8}}.</ref><ref name = "spickgreenswan 33">Spick, Green and Swanborough 2001, p. 33.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)