Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Team building
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Effect on performance == Team building has been scientifically shown to positively affect team effectiveness.<ref>{{cite journal |author= Shuffler, M. L., DiazGranados, D., & Salas, E. |year=2011 |doi= 10.1177/0963721411422054 |title= There's a Science for That: Team Development Interventions in Organizations|journal= Current Directions in Psychological Science|volume= 20|issue=6|pages= 365β372|s2cid=145635591 }}</ref> Goal setting and role clarification were shown to have impact on [[Cognitive behavioral therapy|cognitive]], [[Affect (psychology)|affective]], [[Business process|process]] and [[Performance appraisal|performance]] outcomes. They had the most powerful impact on affective and process outcomes, which implies that team building can help benefit teams experiencing issues with [[negative affect]], such as lack of cohesion or [[Lack of trust|trust]]. It could also improve teams suffering from process issues, such as lack of clarification in roles.<ref name="Klein et al. 2009"/> [[Goal setting]] and role clarification have the greatest impact because they enhance motivation, reduce conflict<ref>{{cite journal |author= Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. |year=2002 |title= Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35 year odyssey |journal= American Psychologist |volume= 57 |issue=9 |pages= 705β717 |pmid= 12237980 |doi=10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705|citeseerx=10.1.1.126.9922 }}</ref> and help to set individual purposes, goals and motivation. Teams with 10 or more members appear to benefit the most from team building. This is attributed to larger teams having β generally speaking β a greater reservoir of cognitive resources and capabilities than smaller teams.<ref>{{cite journal |author= Halebian, J., & Finkelstein, S. |year=1993 |title= Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion |journal= Academy of Management Journal |volume= 36 |issue=4 |pages= 844β863 |doi= 10.2307/256761 |jstor= 256761}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)