Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Textual criticism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Canons of textual criticism === [[Image:Codex Sinaiticus-small.jpg|thumb|200px|[[Gospel of Luke|Luke]] 11:2 in [[Codex Sinaiticus]]]] Various scholars have developed guidelines, or ''canons'' of textual criticism, to guide the exercise of the critic's judgment in determining the best readings of a text. One of the earliest was [[Johann Albrecht Bengel]] (1687β1752), who in 1734 produced an edition of the [[Textus Receptus|Greek New Testament]]. In his commentary, he established the rule ''Proclivi scriptioni praestat ardua'', ("the harder reading is to be preferred").<ref name="bengelrules">{{cite web|url=http://www.bible-researcher.com/rules.html#Bengel|title=Critical Rules of Johann Albrecht Bengel|publisher=Bible-researcher.com|access-date=2008-05-24|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100213010108/http://www.bible-researcher.com/rules.html#Bengel|archive-date=2010-02-13}}</ref> [[Johann Jakob Griesbach]] (1745β1812) published several editions of the New Testament. In his 1796 edition,<ref>J.J. Griesbach, [https://books.google.com/books?id=BLk9AAAAIAAJ&q=novum+testamentum+graece ''Novum Testamentum Graece'']</ref> he established fifteen critical rules. Among them was a variant of Bengel's rule, ''Lectio difficilior potior'', "the harder reading is better." Another was ''Lectio brevior praeferenda'', "the shorter reading is better", based on the idea that scribes were more likely to add than to delete.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bible-researcher.com/rules.html#Griesbach|title=Critical Rules of Johann Albrecht Bengel|publisher=Bible-researcher.com|access-date=2008-05-24|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100213010108/http://www.bible-researcher.com/rules.html#Griesbach|archive-date=2010-02-13}}<br /> "Brevior lectio, nisi testium vetustorum et gravium auctoritate penitus destituatur, praeferenda est verbosiori. Librarii enim multo proniores ad addendum fuerunt, quam ad omittendum."</ref> This rule cannot be applied uncritically, as scribes may omit material inadvertently.{{citation needed|date=May 2023}} [[Brooke Foss Westcott]] (1825β1901) and [[Fenton Hort]] (1828β1892) published an edition of the [[The New Testament in the Original Greek|New Testament in Greek in 1881]]. They proposed nine critical rules, including a version of Bengel's rule, "The reading is less likely to be original that shows a disposition to smooth away difficulties." They also argued that "Readings are approved or rejected by reason of the quality, and not the number, of their supporting witnesses", and that "The reading is to be preferred that most fitly explains the existence of the others."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bible-researcher.com/rules.html#Hort|title=Theories of Westcott and Hort|publisher=Bible-researcher.com|access-date=2008-05-24|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100213010108/http://www.bible-researcher.com/rules.html#Hort|archive-date=2010-02-13}}<br />"The reading is to be preferred that makes the best sense, that is, that best conforms to the grammar and is most congruous with the purport of the rest of the sentence and of the larger context." (2.20)</ref> Many of these rules, although originally developed for biblical textual criticism, have wide applicability to any text susceptible to errors of transmission.{{citation needed|date=May 2023}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)