Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Three Links
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Controversies== During the period of the direct charter flights, the PRC state media stressed that they were domestic flights, whereas the ROC government stressed that they were international flights.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} In reaction to 13 June 2008 agreements, the DPP criticized the government of "yielding to China", and accused [[Straits Exchange Foundation]] Chairman Chiang Pin-kung of "defying the legislature", saying the "[[Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area]] stipulates that legislative resolutions are required before any direct cross-strait links are opened", which was not carried out. Chiang dismissed the accusations, saying he followed the precedent set by former SEF chairman Koo Chen-fu, and would "report to the legislature's Home and Nations Committee instead of the legislative caucuses".<ref name="taipeitimes1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/06/17/2003414978|title=Wang urges speed on cross-strait bill - Taipei Times|date=June 17, 2008|website=www.taipeitimes.com}}</ref> The DPP and the [[Pan-Green Coalition]] has routinely claimed there was a potential compromise on Taiwan's national security should there be liberal three links, suggesting the PRC could disguise troop carriers as commercial aircraft to invade Taiwan, a charge met by criticism from both the PRC and the [[Pan-Blue Coalition]]. In the wake of 13 June 2008 agreements, the DPP raised the issue of national security again, criticising its plans to open up to eight airports when China would open only five. The eight airports included Hualien and Taitung, which also operate as military airfields, thus creating a security threat. They also expressed concern over the possibility of absconding Chinese tourists.<ref name="taipeitimes1"/> A defense ministry report on 18 May 2008 concluded that direct charter flights would be a national security threat, and the air force has reportedly expressed concern that six of the airports except the Taiwan Taoyuan and Kaohsiung airports have military installations and aircraft. The Vice Minister of National Defense [[Lin Chen-yi]] has further recommended to maintain indirect flight routes via a third party's air space on 23 May 2008. But on 18 June 2008, the Minister of National Defense [[Chen Chao-min]] declared that direct flights without the involvement of any third party air space would not pose a threat to national security, saying "The final routes for direct charter flights shall be decided by the Mainland Affairs Council and the [[Ministry of Transportation and Communications (Republic of China)|Ministry of Transportation and Communications]]. We will submit recommendations to the MOTC that take national security into consideration, but I do not foresee any problems if the flights travel directly between Taiwan and China".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2008/06/19/2003415141|title=Direct flights not a threat: MND - Taipei Times|date=June 19, 2008|website=www.taipeitimes.com}}</ref> The DPP gave itself credit for having "laid the groundwork" for opening weekend charter flights and allowing Chinese tourists into Taiwan, both of which did not occur under KMT rule, and criticised the current negotiators as being "inexperienced and ill-prepared".<ref name="taipeitimes1"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)