Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Topology optimization
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Structural compliance === {{unreferenced section|date=December 2018}} A stiff structure is one that has the least possible displacement when given certain set of boundary conditions. A global measure of the displacements is the [[strain energy]] (also called [[Stiffness#Compliance|compliance]]) of the structure under the prescribed boundary conditions. The lower the strain energy the higher the stiffness of the structure. So, the objective function of the problem is to minimize the strain energy. On a broad level, one can visualize that the more the material, the less the deflection as there will be more material to resist the loads. So, the optimization requires an opposing constraint, the volume constraint. This is in reality a cost factor, as we would not want to spend a lot of money on the material. To obtain the total material utilized, an integration of the selection field over the volume can be done. Finally the elasticity governing differential equations are plugged in so as to get the final problem statement. :<math>\min_{\rho}\; \int_{\Omega} \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{\sigma}:\mathbf{\varepsilon} \,\mathrm{d}\Omega</math> subject to: *<math> \rho \,\in\, [0,\, 1] </math> *<math> \int_{\Omega} \rho\, \mathrm{d}\Omega \;\leq\; V^*</math> *<math> \mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{\sigma} \,+\, \mathbf{F} \;=\; {\mathbf{0}} </math> *<math> \mathbf{\sigma} \;=\; \mathsf{C}:\mathbf{\varepsilon}</math> But, a straightforward implementation in the finite element framework of such a problem is still infeasible owing to issues such as: # Mesh dependency—Mesh Dependency means that the design obtained on one mesh is not the one that will be obtained on another mesh. The features of the design become more intricate as the mesh gets refined.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Allaire |first1=Grégoire |last2=Henrot |first2=Antoine |title=On some recent advances in shape optimization |journal=Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences |date=May 2001 |volume=329 |issue=5 |pages=383–396 |doi=10.1016/S1620-7742(01)01349-6 |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1620774201013496 |access-date=2021-09-12 |series=Series IIB - Mechanics |publisher=Elsevier |bibcode=2001CRASB.329..383A |language=en |issn=1620-7742}}</ref> # Numerical instabilities—The selection of region in the form of a chess board.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shukla |first1=Avinash |last2=Misra |first2=Anadi |last3=Kumar |first3=Sunil |title=Checkerboard Problem in Finite Element Based Topology Optimization |journal=International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology |date=September 2013 |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=1769–1774|publisher=CiteSeer |citeseerx=10.1.1.670.6771 | url=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=5BECA0B81B176391016659D59276F7FE?doi=10.1.1.670.6771&rep=rep1&type=pdf |access-date=2022-02-14 |language=en |issn=2231-1963}}</ref> Some techniques such as [[Kernel_(image_processing)|filtering]] based on image processing<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bourdin |first1=Blaise |title=Filters in topology optimization |journal=International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering |date=2001-03-30 |volume=50 |issue=9 |pages=2143–2158 |doi=10.1002/nme.116 |url=http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/nme.116 |access-date=2020-08-02 |publisher=Wiley |bibcode=2001IJNME..50.2143B |s2cid=38860291 |language=en |issn=1097-0207}}</ref> are currently being used to alleviate some of these issues. Although it seemed like this was purely a heuristic approach for a long time, theoretical connections to nonlocal elasticity have been made to support the physical sense of these methods.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sigmund |first1=Ole |last2=Maute |first2=Kurt |title=Sensitivity filtering from a continuum mechanics perspective |journal=Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization |date=October 2012 |volume=46 |issue=4 |pages=471–475 |doi=10.1007/s00158-012-0814-4 |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00158-012-0814-4 |access-date=2021-06-17 |publisher=Springer |s2cid=253680268 |issn=1615-1488}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)