Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Computable function
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Relation to recursively defined functions === In a function defined by a [[recursive definition]], each value is defined by a fixed first-order formula of other, previously defined values of the same function or other functions, which might be simply constants. A subset of these is the [[primitive recursive function]]s. Another example is the [[Ackermann function]], which is recursively defined but not primitive recursive.<ref>{{cite journal |last= Péter |first= Rózsa |author-link= Rózsa Péter |journal= [[Mathematische Annalen]] |title= Konstruktion nichtrekursiver Funktionen |year= 1935 |volume= 111 |pages= 42–60 |doi= 10.1007/BF01472200 |s2cid= 121107217 }}</ref> For definitions of this type to avoid circularity or infinite regress, it is necessary that recursive calls to the same function within a definition be to arguments that are smaller in some [[well-partial-order]] on the function's domain. For instance, for the Ackermann function <math>A</math>, whenever the definition of <math>A(x,y)</math> refers to <math>A(p,q)</math>, then <math>(p,q) < (x,y)</math> w.r.t. the [[lexicographic order]] on pairs of [[natural number]]s. In this case, and in the case of the primitive recursive functions, well-ordering is obvious, but some "refers-to" relations are nontrivial to prove as being well-orderings. Any function defined recursively in a well-ordered way is computable: each value can be computed by expanding a tree of recursive calls to the function, and this expansion must terminate after a finite number of calls, because otherwise [[Kőnig's lemma]] would lead to an infinite descending sequence of calls, violating the assumption of well-ordering.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)