Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Consistent life ethic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Capital punishment=== {{See also|Catholic Church and capital punishment}} In a 1977 statement following the ''[[Gregg v. Georgia]]'' decision—which reaffirmed the [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court's]] acceptance of the use of the [[Capital punishment in the United States|death penalty in the United States]]—Bernardin wrote, "Many have expressed the view [...] that in this day of increasing violence and disregard for human life, a return to the use of capital punishment can only lead to further erosion of respect for life and to the increased brutalization of our society."<ref>{{Cite news |date=4 February 1977 |title=Archbishop Bernardin Opposes Death Penalty |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1977/02/04/archbishop-bernardin-opposes-death-penalty/58957866-d294-4250-b2ec-7444d61e8b5a/ |access-date=21 August 2022}}</ref> Bernardin's opposition to [[capital punishment]] was rooted in the conviction that an atmosphere of respect for life must pervade a society, and resorting to the death penalty would not support this attitude.<ref>Bernardin, Cardinal Joseph A.: ''The Seamless Garment: Writings on the Consistent Ethic of Life'' Orbis Books, 2008.</ref> Modern-day adherents to the consistent life ethic continue to oppose the use of capital punishment; in this advocacy, some echo Bernardin's appeal to the [[sanctity of life]], while others emphasize the relationships between class, [[Race and capital punishment in the United States|race and capital punishment]] to argue that there is not a way for capital punishment to be used justly.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Costello |first=Carol |date=28 May 2014 |title=Can you be pro-life and pro-death penalty? |work=CNN |url=https://www.cnn.com/2014/05/14/opinion/costello-pro-life-pro-death-penalty/index.html |access-date=21 August 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Rehumanize {{!}} On Capital Punishment |url=https://www.rehumanizeintl.org/capital-punishment |access-date=21 August 2022 |website=Rehumanize International}}</ref> One outspoken anti-death penalty activist is Sister [[Helen Prejean]]. Her books ''[[Dead Man Walking (book)|Dead Man Walking]]'' and ''The Death of Innocents: An Eyewitness Account to Wrongful Executions'' are autobiographical accounts of the time she spent ministering to death row inmates.<ref>[[Rachel MacNair|MacNair, Rachel M.]], and Zunes, Stephen: ''Consistently Opposing Killing: from abortion to assisted suicide, the death penalty and war'', pages 58–60. Praeger Publishers, 2008.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)