Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Crookes radiometer
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Incorrect theories=== Crookes incorrectly suggested that the force was due to the [[radiation pressure|pressure of light]].<ref>{{cite journal |first=William |last=Crookes |author-link=William Crookes |date=1 January 1874 |doi=10.1098/rstl.1874.0015 |title=On Attraction and Repulsion Resulting from Radiation |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London |volume=164 |pages=501–527|s2cid=110306977 |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1432450 |doi-access=free }}.</ref> This theory was originally supported by [[James Clerk Maxwell]], who had predicted this force. This explanation is still often seen in leaflets packaged with the device. The first experiment to test this theory was done by [[Arthur Schuster]] in 1876, who observed that there was a force on the glass bulb of the Crookes radiometer that was in the opposite direction to the rotation of the vanes. This showed that the force turning the vanes was generated inside the radiometer. If light pressure were the cause of the rotation, then the better the vacuum in the bulb, the less air resistance to movement, and the faster the vanes should spin. In 1901, with a better vacuum pump, [[Pyotr Nikolaevich Lebedev|Pyotr Lebedev]] showed that in fact, the radiometer only works when there is low-pressure gas in the bulb, and the vanes stay motionless in a hard vacuum.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Lebedew|first=Peter|year=1901|title=Untersuchungen über die Druckkräfte des Lichtes|journal=Annalen der Physik|volume=311|issue=11|pages=433–458| doi=10.1002/andp.19013111102|bibcode=1901AnP...311..433L|url=https://zenodo.org/record/1424005}}</ref> Finally, if light pressure were the motive force, the radiometer would spin in the opposite direction, as the [[photon]]s on the shiny side being reflected would deposit more momentum than on the black side, where the photons are absorbed. This results from [[conservation of momentum]] – the momentum of the reflected photon exiting on the light side must be matched by a [[reaction (physics)|reaction]] on the vane that reflected it. The actual pressure exerted by light is far too small to move these vanes, but can be measured with devices such as the [[Nichols radiometer]]. It is in fact possible to make the radiometer spin in the opposite direction by either heating it or putting it in a cold environment (like a freezer) in absence of light, when black sides become cooler than the white ones due to the thermal radiation. Another incorrect theory was that the heat on the dark side was causing the material to outgas, which pushed the radiometer around. This was later effectively disproved by both Schuster's experiments<ref>{{Cite journal |jstor = 27757296|last1 = Brush|first1 = S. G.|title = Maxwell, Osborne Reynolds, and the Radiometer|journal = Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences|volume = 1|pages = 105–125|last2 = Everitt|first2 = C. W. F.|year = 1969|doi = 10.2307/27757296}}</ref> (1876) and Lebedev's (1901)<ref name=":0" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)