Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Endowment effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Connection-based, or "psychological ownership" theories=== Connection-based theories propose that the attachment or association with the self-induced by owning a good is responsible for the endowment effect (for a review, see Morewedge & Giblin, 2015<ref name="Morewedge2015"/>). Work by Morewedge, Shu, Gilbert and Wilson (2009)<ref name="Morewedge2009"/> provides support for these theories, as does work by Maddux et al. (2010).<ref name=Maddux/> For example, research participants who were given one mug and asked how much they would pay for a second mug ("owner-buyers") were WTP as much as "owners-sellers," another group of participants who were given a mug and asked how much they were WTA to sell it (both groups valued the mug in question more than buyers who were not given a mug).<ref name="Morewedge2009"/> Others have argued that the short duration of ownership or highly prosaic items typically used in endowment effect type studies is not sufficient to produce such a connection, conducting research demonstrating support for those points (e.g. Liersch & Rottenstreich, Working Paper). Two paths by which attachment or self-associations increase the value of a good have been proposed (Morewedge & Giblin, 2015).<ref name="Morewedge2015"/> An [[attachment theory]] suggests that ownership creates a non-transferable balanced association between the self and the good. The good is incorporated into the self-concept of the owner, becoming part of her identity and imbuing it with attributes related to her self-concept. Self-associations may take the form of an emotional attachment to the good. Once an attachment has formed, the potential loss of the good is perceived as a threat to the self.<ref name=":0"/> A real-world example of this would be an individual refusing to part with a college T-shirt because it supports one's identity as an alumnus of that university. A second route by which ownership may increase value is through a [[Self-referential encoding|self-referential memory effect]] (SRE) β the better encoding and recollection of stimuli associated with the self-concept.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Symons |first1=Cynthia S. |last2=Johnson |first2=Blair T. |title=The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis |journal=Psychological Bulletin |date=1997 |volume=121 |issue=3 |pages=371β394 |doi=10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371 |url=https://opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=chip_docs |pmid=9136641|url-access=subscription }}</ref> People have a better memory for goods they own than goods they do not own. The self-referential memory effect for owned goods may act thus as an endogenous framing effect. During a transaction, attributes of a good may be more accessible to its owners than are other attributes of the transaction. Because most goods have more positive than negative features, this accessibility bias should result in owners more positively evaluating their goods than do non-owners.<ref name="Morewedge2015"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)