Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Formal concept analysis
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Arrow relations == Formal concept analysis has elaborate mathematical foundations,<ref name="GW" /> making the field versatile. As a basic example we mention the ''arrow relations'', which are simple and easy to compute, but very useful. They are defined as follows: For {{math|1=''g'' β ''G''}} and {{math|1=''m'' β ''M''}} let : {{math|1=''g'' β ''m'' β (''g, m'') β ''I'' and if ''m''β''{{prime|n}}'' and ''{{prime|m}} β {{prime|n}} '', then (''g, n'') β ''I'',}} and dually : {{math|1=''g'' β ''m'' β (''g, m'') β ''I'' and if ''{{prime|g}}''β''{{prime|h}}'' and ''{{prime|g}} β {{prime|h}} '', then (''h, m'') β ''I''.}} Since only non-incident object-attribute pairs can be related, these relations can conveniently be recorded in the table representing a formal context. Many lattice properties can be read off from the arrow relations, including distributivity and several of its generalizations. They also reveal structural information and can be used for determining, e.g., the congruence relations of the lattice.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)