Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Hilbert's fourth problem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==''σ''-metrics== ===Sufficient condition for flat metrics=== [[Georg Hamel]] was first to contribute to the solution of Hilbert's fourth problem.<ref name="Hamel1903"/> He proved the following statement. '''Theorem'''. A regular Finsler metric <math>F(x,y)=F(x_1,\ldots,x_n,y_1,\ldots,y_n)</math> is flat if and only if it satisfies the conditions: : <math>\frac{\partial^2 F^2}{\partial x^i \, \partial y^j} = \frac{\partial^2 F^2}{\partial x^j \, \partial y^i}, \, i,j=1,\ldots,n.</math> ===Crofton formula=== {{main|Crofton formula}} Consider a set of all oriented lines on a plane. Each line is defined by the parameters <math>\rho</math> and <math>\varphi,</math> where <math>\rho</math> is a distance from the origin to the line, and <math>\varphi</math> is an angle between the line and the ''x''-axis. Then the set of all oriented lines is homeomorphic to a circular cylinder of radius 1 with the area element <math>dS = d\rho \, d\varphi </math>. Let <math>\gamma</math> be a rectifiable curve on a plane. Then the length of <math>\gamma</math> is <math display="block">L = \frac{1}{4} \iint_\Omega n( \rho, \varphi) \, dp \, d\varphi</math> where <math>\Omega</math> is a set of lines that intersect the curve <math>\gamma</math>, and <math>n(p, \varphi)</math> is the number of intersections of the line with <math>\gamma</math>. Crofton proved this statement in 1870.<ref>{{cite book | last1=Santaló | first1=Luís A. | authorlink1=Luis Santaló | chapter=Integral geometry | title=Studies in Global Geometry and Analysis | editor-last1=Chern | editor-first1=S. S. | publisher=Mathematical Association of America, Washington, D. C. | pages=147–195 | date=1967}}</ref> A similar statement holds for a projective space. === Blaschke–Busemann measure === In 1966, in his talk at the [[International Congress of Mathematicians|International Mathematical Congress]] in Moscow, [[Herbert Busemann]] introduced a new class of flat metrics. On a set of lines on the projective plane <math>RP^{2}</math> he introduced a completely additive non-negative measure <math>\sigma</math>, which satisfies the following conditions: # <math>\sigma (\tau P)=0</math>, where <math>\tau P</math> is a set of straight lines passing through a point ''P''; # <math>\sigma (\tau X)>0</math>, where <math>\tau X</math> is a set of straight lines passing through some set ''X'' that contains a straight line segment; # <math>\sigma (RP^{n})</math> is finite. If we consider a <math>\sigma</math>-metric in an arbitrary convex domain <math>\Omega</math> of a projective space <math>RP^{2}</math>, then condition 3) should be replaced by the following: for any set ''H'' such that ''H'' is contained in <math>\Omega</math> and the closure of ''H'' does not intersect the boundary of <math>\Omega</math>, the inequality : <math>\sigma(\pi H)<\infty</math> holds.<ref name="Buseman1955">{{cite book | last1=Busemann | first1=Herbert | authorlink1=Herbert Busemann | title=The Geometry of Geodesics | publisher=Academic Press, New York | date=1955}}</ref> Using this measure, the <math>\sigma</math>-metric on <math>RP^{2}</math> is defined by : <math>|x,y|=\sigma \left( \tau [x,y] \right),</math> where <math>\tau [x,y]</math> is the set of straight lines that intersect the segment <math>[x,y]</math>. The triangle inequality for this metric follows from [[Pasch's theorem]]. '''Theorem'''. <math>\sigma</math>-metric on <math>RP^{2}</math> is flat, i.e., the geodesics are the straight lines of the projective space. But Busemann was far from the idea that <math>\sigma</math>-metrics exhaust all flat metrics. He wrote, ''"The freedom in the choice of a metric with given geodesics is for non-Riemannian metrics so great that it may be doubted whether there really exists a convincing characterization of all Desarguesian spaces"''.<ref name="Buseman1955"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)