Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Huemul Project
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Cancellation== Argentine physicists were also critical of the announcement, but found little interest on the part of Per贸n, who was still at odds with the academic mainstream. Gonz谩lez was growing increasingly frustrated with Richter, and in February 1952 told Per贸n that either Richter left the project, or he did. Per贸n accepted Gonz谩lez's resignation and replaced him with his aide, Navy Captain Pedro Iraolagoit铆a. Iraolagoit铆a soon began to protest as well, finally convincing Per贸n to have the project investigated.{{sfn|Hymans|2012|p=227}} Instead of calling upon the local physics community, Per贸n put together a team consisting of Iraolagoit铆a, a priest, two engineers including [[Mario B谩ncora]], and young physicist [[Jos茅 Antonio Balseiro]], who was at that time studying in England and was asked to return with all haste.{{sfn|Cardona|Cohen|Louie|2003|p=9}} The team visited the site for a series of demonstrations between 5 and 8 September 1952.{{sfn|Balseiro|1952}} The committee analyzed Richter's work and published separate reports on the topic on 15 September. Balseiro, in particular, was convinced nothing nuclear was taking place. His report critiqued Richter's claims about how the system was supposed to work, especially the claims that the system was reaching the temperatures needed to demonstrate fusion; he stated that fusion reactions would require something on the order of 40 million kelvin, while the center of the electric arc would be perhaps 4,000 to 100,000 kelvin at most. He then pointed out that Richter's radiation detectors showed large activity whenever the arc was discharged, even if there was no fuel present. Meanwhile, the team's own detectors showed low activity throughout.{{sfn|Hagood|2014|p=268}} They reported their findings to Per贸n on 15 February.{{sfn|Balseiro|1952}} Richter was allowed to officially respond to the report. The government appointed physicists [[Richard Gans]] and Antonio Rodr铆guez to review the first report as well as Richter's response to it. This second group endorsed the findings of the first review panel and found Richter's response inadequate. On 22 November, while Richter was in Buenos Aires, a military team occupied the site. They found that many of the instruments were not even connected, and the project was pronounced a fraud.{{sfn|Hagood|2014|p=268}} Argentines jokingly referred to the affair as the ''Huele a mula'', or "it smells like a con".{{sfn|Newton|1992|p=379}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)