Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Human Action
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Part Seven: The Place of Economics in Society === '''Chapter 37''', "The Nondescript Character of Economics", argues that economics is [[Difference (philosophy)|different]] from other [[Science|branches of knowledge]] because its theories cannot be proven or [[Falsifiability|falsified by experience]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Singularity of Economics |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/919 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161156/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/919 |url-status=dead }}</ref> It is also noted that convincing the majority of the public is necessary for the insights of [[Economist|economic theorists]] to improve civilization.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Economics and Public Opinion |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/920 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161150/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/920 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The chapter concludes by criticizing the old liberals for assuming that the majority would support capitalism based on its benefits and their ability to [[reason]] correctly, without anticipating the success of [[Anti-capitalism|anticapitalist]] propaganda.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Illusion of the Old Liberals |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/921 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170206202229/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/921 |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 6, 2017 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en }}</ref> '''Chapter 38''', "The Place of Economics in Learning", explains, firstly, that the establishment of an institute for business-cycle research is not sufficient to find cures for business cycles.<ref name=":104">{{Cite web |title=The Study of Economics |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/927 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161153/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/927 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Clear thinking and sound [[Economics|economic theory]] are needed.<ref name=":104" /> Secondly, the rise of [[Economist|economics as a profession]] is due to [[Interventionism (politics)|interventionism]], and many [[Economist|professional economists]] only [[Privilege (law)|advance the interests of a small group]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Economics as a Profession |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/928 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161434/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/928 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Thirdly, economists can only [[Prediction|predict]] the general timing of [[Business cycle|boom-bust cycles]], and successful entrepreneurs need to have better [[Forecasting|forecasts]] than their [[Rivalry|rivals]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Forecasting as a Profession |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/929 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161218/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/929 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Fourthly, although economics is a unified whole, university professors engage in [[Division of labour|compartmentalized]] [[Analysis|analyses]], and the fallacies of [[Interventionism (politics)|interventionism]] preached by professors may lead some students to support [[socialism]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Economics and the Universities |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/930 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161404/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/930 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Fifthly, the conflict between different [[Philosophy of history|interpretations of history]] and economics exists in [[school]]s, but most students are too [[Maturity (psychological)|immature]] to [[Choice|choose]] among them, and teachers cannot present them [[Neutrality (philosophy)|neutrally]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=General Education and Economics |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/931 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224163219/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/931 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Lastly, modern [[government]]s [[Censorship|suppress freedom of economic thought]], but citizens have a [[duty]] to familiarize themselves with basic economic theory, as modern [[Political scandal|political controversies]] revolve around the [[Conflict (process)|conflict]] between socialism and the market economy.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Economics and the Citizen |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/932 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161242/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/932 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Economics and Freedom |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/933 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161616/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/933 |url-status=dead }}</ref> '''Chapter 39''', "Economics and the Essential Problems of [[Human condition|Human Existence]]", explores the [[Relations (philosophy)|relationship]] between science and life,<ref name=":105">{{Cite web |title=Science and Life |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/934 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161551/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/934 |url-status=dead }}</ref> economics and [[Value judgment|judgments of value]],<ref name=":106">{{Cite web |title=Economics and Judgements of Value |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/935 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161411/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/935 |url-status=dead }}</ref> and economic [[cognition]] and [[Action (philosophy)|human action]].<ref name=":107">{{Cite web |title=Economic Cognition and Human Action |url=https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/936 |access-date=2023-02-24 |website=Mises Institute |language=en |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224161207/https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/936 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Critics argue that science is sterile because it is [[value-free]], but Mises argues that science provides humans with the information they need to properly form their valuations and choose the proper means to achieve their desired ends.<ref name=":105" /> He also addresses criticisms that economics smuggles value judgments into its analyses, and that it assumes [[Economic materialism|people are only concerned with material well-being]], stating that economics deals with action as such and does not make assumptions about the objectives of action.<ref name=":106" /> Finally, Mises discusses the three restrictions on human freedom to act and choose, with the third restriction β the regularity of phenomena due to the connection between means and ends β being the subject of [[praxeology]].<ref name=":107" /> If people ignore praxeology's teachings, "they will not annul economics", but "they will [[Human extinction|stamp out society and the human race]]."<ref name=":107" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)