Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Inverse function theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Applications == ===Implicit function theorem=== The inverse function theorem can be used to solve a system of equations :<math>\begin{align} &f_1(x) = y_1 \\ &\quad \vdots\\ &f_n(x) = y_n,\end{align}</math> i.e., expressing <math>y_1, \dots, y_n</math> as functions of <math>x = (x_1, \dots, x_n)</math>, provided the Jacobian matrix is invertible. The [[implicit function theorem]] allows to solve a more general system of equations: :<math>\begin{align} &f_1(x, y) = 0 \\ &\quad \vdots\\ &f_n(x, y) = 0\end{align}</math> for <math>y</math> in terms of <math>x</math>. Though more general, the theorem is actually a consequence of the inverse function theorem. First, the precise statement of the implicit function theorem is as follows:<ref>{{harvnb|Spivak|1965|loc=Theorem 2-12.}}</ref> *given a map <math>f : \mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^m</math>, if <math>f(a, b) = 0</math>, <math>f</math> is continuously differentiable in a neighborhood of <math>(a, b)</math> and the derivative of <math>y \mapsto f(a, y)</math> at <math>b</math> is invertible, then there exists a differentiable map <math>g : U \to V</math> for some neighborhoods <math>U, V</math> of <math>a, b</math> such that <math>f(x, g(x)) = 0</math>. Moreover, if <math>f(x, y) = 0, x \in U, y \in V</math>, then <math>y = g(x)</math>; i.e., <math>g(x)</math> is a unique solution. To see this, consider the map <math>F(x, y) = (x, f(x, y))</math>. By the inverse function theorem, <math>F : U \times V \to W</math> has the inverse <math>G</math> for some neighborhoods <math>U, V, W</math>. We then have: :<math>(x, y) = F(G_1(x, y), G_2(x, y)) = (G_1(x, y), f(G_1(x, y), G_2(x, y))),</math> implying <math>x = G_1(x, y)</math> and <math>y = f(x, G_2(x, y)).</math> Thus <math>g(x) = G_2(x, 0)</math> has the required property. <math>\square</math> ===Giving a manifold structure=== In differential geometry, the inverse function theorem is used to show that the pre-image of a [[regular value]] under a smooth map is a manifold.<ref>{{harvnb|Spivak|1965|loc=Theorem 5-1. and Theorem 2-13.}}</ref> Indeed, let <math>f : U \to \mathbb{R}^r</math> be such a smooth map from an open subset of <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math> (since the result is local, there is no loss of generality with considering such a map). Fix a point <math>a</math> in <math>f^{-1}(b)</math> and then, by permuting the coordinates on <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math>, assume the matrix <math>\left [ \frac{\partial f_i}{\partial x_j}(a) \right]_{1 \le i, j \le r}</math> has rank <math>r</math>. Then the map <math>F : U \to \mathbb{R}^r \times \mathbb{R}^{n-r} = \mathbb{R}^n, \, x \mapsto (f(x), x_{r+1}, \dots, x_n)</math> is such that <math>F'(a)</math> has rank <math>n</math>. Hence, by the inverse function theorem, we find the smooth inverse <math>G</math> of <math>F</math> defined in a neighborhood <math>V \times W</math> of <math>(b, a_{r+1}, \dots, a_n)</math>. We then have :<math>x = (F \circ G)(x) = (f(G(x)), G_{r+1}(x), \dots, G_n(x)),</math> which implies :<math>(f \circ G)(x_1, \dots, x_n) = (x_1, \dots, x_r).</math> That is, after the change of coordinates by <math>G</math>, <math>f</math> is a coordinate projection (this fact is known as the [[submersion theorem]]). Moreover, since <math>G : V \times W \to U' = G(V \times W)</math> is bijective, the map :<math>g = G(b, \cdot) : W \to f^{-1}(b) \cap U', \, (x_{r+1}, \dots, x_n) \mapsto G(b, x_{r+1}, \dots, x_n)</math> is bijective with the smooth inverse. That is to say, <math>g</math> gives a local parametrization of <math>f^{-1}(b)</math> around <math>a</math>. Hence, <math>f^{-1}(b)</math> is a manifold. <math>\square</math> (Note the proof is quite similar to the proof of the implicit function theorem and, in fact, the implicit function theorem can be also used instead.) More generally, the theorem shows that if a smooth map <math>f : P \to E</math> is transversal to a submanifold <math>M \subset E</math>, then the pre-image <math>f^{-1}(M) \hookrightarrow P</math> is a submanifold.<ref>{{cite web|website=northwestern.edu|title=Transversality |url=https://sites.math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/4transversality.pdf}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)