Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Java Man
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Reclassification as ''Homo erectus''=== {{further|Homo erectus}} Based on Weidenreich's work and on his suggestion that ''Pithecanthropus erectus'' and ''Sinanthropus pekinensis'' were connected through a series of [[interbreeding]] populations, German biologist [[Ernst Mayr]] reclassified them both as being part of the same species: ''[[Homo erectus]]''.{{sfn|Boaz|Ciochon |2004|pp=66β67}} Mayr presented his conclusion at the [[Cold Spring Harbor Symposium]] in 1950,{{sfn|Schmalzer|2008|p=98. The original paper is {{harvnb|Mayr|1950}}}} and this resulted in Dubois's ''erectus'' species being reclassified under the [[genus]] ''Homo''. As part of the reclassification, Mayr included not only ''Sinanthropus'' and ''Pithecanthropus'', but also ''Plesianthropus'', ''Paranthropus'', ''Javanthropus'', and several other genera as [[Synonym (taxonomy)|synonyms]], arguing that all human ancestors were part of a single genus (''Homo''), and that "never one more than one species of man existed on the earth at any one time".{{sfn|Delisle|2007|p=298, citing Mayr's 1950 paper}} A "revolution in taxonomy", Mayr's single-species approach to human evolution was quickly accepted.{{sfn|Boaz|Ciochon|2004 |p=67}} It shaped [[paleoanthropology]] in the 1950s and lasted into the 1970s, when the African genus ''[[Australopithecus]]'' was accepted into the human [[phylogenetic tree|evolutionary tree]].{{sfnm|1a1=Schmalzer|1y=2008|1p=98 ["the "single-species" thesis to which he was committed became the theoretical foundation for paleoanthropology for years to come"]|2a1=Boaz|2a2=Ciochon|2y=2004|2p=67 ["was to sweep anthropology in the 1950s" ... "Thus was born the single-species hypothesis, a powerful model that endured until the late 1970s when fossil discoveries in Africa disproved it, at least for the early part of the hominid fossil record"]}} In the 1970s, a tendency developed to regard the Javanese variety of ''H. erectus'' as a subspecies, ''Homo erectus erectus'', with the Chinese variety being referred to as ''Homo erectus pekinensis''.<ref>{{cite book |last=Sartono |first=S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ejsyIZMsC9oC&pg=PA327 |chapter=Implications arising from Pithecanthropus VIII|title=Paleoanthropology: Morphology and Paleoecology |editor=Russell H. Tuttle |publisher=Mouton & Co. |date=1975 |isbn=978-90-279-7699-4 |page=328}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)