Editing Media coverage of the Iraq War (section)

=="Embedded" reporters==
{{More citations needed section |date=March 2020}}
Around 600 journalists were "[[Embedded journalist|embedded]]" with military units, 80% being [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[United States|American]]. [[The Pentagon]] established the policy of "embedding" reporters with military units.

[[Robert Entman]], professor of communication at the [[George Washington University]] and critic of mainstream media for decades, indicated it was a very wise tactic from the Pentagon. He mentioned there were more chances for the journalists to make favorable reports whilst in Iraq with British and American soldiers than if they had been asking questions in Washington. Entman indicated there is a natural cultural bias of American journalists in favor of military troops of their own country and that journalists do like to satisfy the government upon which they rely for information, as well as the public on whom they depend commercially. Entman also mentioned the high number of retired generals making comments on TV, pointing out these could not be considered independent experts as they were still paid by the government. He claims the [[British Broadcasting Corporation]] was much more neutral and informative on cultural and historical background than most American television reports.{{citation needed|date=October 2012}}

The Ministry of Defense (MoD) explained "maintaining morale as well as information dominance will rank as important as physical protection". An MoD-commissioned commercial analysis of the print output produced by embeds shows that 90% of their reporting was either "positive or neutral."<ref>{{cite news| url=http://media.guardian.co.uk/iraqandthemedia/story/0,12823,1118405,00.html | work=[[The Guardian]] | location=London | title=The domination effect | date=January 8, 2004 | access-date=May 12, 2010 | first=David | last=Miller |author-link=David Miller (sociologist)}}</ref>