Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Practical Magic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Critical reception=== ''Practical Magic'' received negative reviews from critics upon release,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Galuppo |first=Mia |date=June 10, 2024 |title=Sandra Bullock, Nicole Kidman Returning for 'Practical Magic' Sequel |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/practical-magic-sequel-sandra-bullock-nicole-kidman-1235918619/ |access-date=November 4, 2024 |work=[[The Hollywood Reporter]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Nateras |first=Jose |date=November 1, 2021 |title=Does Practical Magic hold up? 'Tis the season to find out |url=https://www.avclub.com/does-practical-magic-hold-up-tis-the-season-to-find-o-1847963517 |access-date=November 4, 2024 |work=[[The A.V. Club]]}}</ref> who panned its inconsistent tone and script.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Framke |first=Caroline |author-link=Caroline Framke |date=October 31, 2016 |title=The flawed but fun Practical Magic is the Thelma and Louise of witch movies |url=https://www.vox.com/2015/10/31/9647652/practical-magic-review-witches |access-date=November 4, 2024 |work=[[Vox (website)|Vox]] |quote=The scattered script (written by Akiva Goldsman, Robin Swicord, and Adam Brooks) and constantly changing tenor are why Practical Magic received such negative reviews upon its 1998 release.}}</ref> The [[review aggregator]] [[Rotten Tomatoes]] reported an approval rating of 26%, with an average score of 4.8/10, based on 101 reviews. The site's consensus states: "''Practical Magic''{{'}}s jarring tonal shifts sink what little potential its offbeat story may have{{snd}}though Nicole Kidman and Sandra Bullock's chemistry makes a strong argument for future collaborations."<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/practical_magic | title = Practical Magic | work = [[Rotten Tomatoes]] | publisher = [[Fandango Media|Fandango]] | access-date = December 29, 2024 | archive-date = 11 October 2023 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20231011205927/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/practical_magic | url-status = live }}</ref> Another review aggregator, [[Metacritic]], which assigns a [[weighted average]], gives a score of 46 out of 100 reviews based on reviews from 22 critics, indicating <!-- Cited terminology, please do not change! -->"mixed or average reviews".<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.metacritic.com/movie/practical-magic | title = Practical Magic | publisher = [[CBS Interactive]] | work = [[Metacritic]] | access-date = December 4, 2012 | archive-date = May 29, 2023 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230529054623/https://www.metacritic.com/movie/practical-magic | url-status = live }}</ref> Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of 'B-' on an A+ to F scale.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Practical Magic |url=https://www.cinemascore.com/ |access-date=2022-09-20 |website=CinemaScore |language=en-US |archive-date=1999-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19991127210934/https://www.cinemascore.com/ |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Owen Gleiberman]] of ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' gave ''Practical Magic'' a negative review, calling it "a witch comedy so slapdash, plodding, and muddled it seems to have had a hex put on it."<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/article/1998/10/16/practical-magic/|last=Gleiberman|first=Owen|title=Practical Magic Review|magazine=[[Entertainment Weekly]]|date=October 16, 1998|access-date=December 4, 2012|url-status=live|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120112150837/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,63751,00.html|archive-date=January 12, 2012}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] of the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' spoke of the film's unsure tone, "veering uncertainly from horror to laughs to romance", and opined that the film "is too scary for children and too childish for adults".<ref name=Ebert>{{cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/practical-magic-1998|last=Ebert|first=Roger|title=Practical Magic|work=rogerebert.com|publisher=Sun-Times Media Group|date=October 16, 1998|access-date=December 4, 2012|archive-date=October 26, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121026124115/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F19981016%2FREVIEWS%2F810160303|url-status=live}}</ref> Garth Stahl of the ''[[Hartford Courant]]'' was more positive, noting that women in [[Black comedy|dark comedy]] and depictions of sisterhood are rare in film.<ref name="Stahl">{{Cite news |last=Stahl |first=Garth |date=1998-10-25 |title=Practical Magic Should Have Focused on Its Dark Side |url=https://www.courant.com/1998/10/25/practical-magic-should-have-focused-on-its-dark-side/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20241024012711/https://www.courant.com/1998/10/25/practical-magic-should-have-focused-on-its-dark-side/ |archive-date=October 24, 2024 |access-date=October 24, 2024 |work=Hartford Courant}}</ref> He wrote ''Practical Magic'' "has its flaws. Some scenes are weak, occasionally lines are a little muddled, and there is some plot underdevelopment. Yet it is daring and fun — a frolic for two charming actresses and a dapper film premise".<ref name="Stahl" /> He concluded "The main source of attraction is undeniably the enchanting and witty witchcraft. It is simultaneously what makes the Owen sisters outcasts and what makes them special. With a few very sharp scenes, including a jazzy dance sequence, 'Practical Magic' is worth [it]. It is a step toward allowing women to assert themselves in the genre of dark comedy. Now isn't that practical."<ref name="Stahl" /> Reviewing the film for [[Amazon (company)|Amazon]], Tom Keogh said, "The film has a variety of tonal changes—cute, scary, glum—that Dunne can't always effectively juggle. But the female-centric, celebratory nature of the film (the fantasies, the sharing, the witchy bonds) is infectious, and supporting roles by Dianne Wiest and Stockard Channing as Kidman and Bullock's magical aunts are a lot of fun."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Keogh |first=Tom |title=Practical Magic |isbn=0790740060 }}</ref> The film has acquired a cult following over the years.<ref name="Vulture">{{cite news |last1=Shapiro |first1=Lila |title=''Practical Magic'' Got Cursed by an Actual Witch. Is That Why It Bombed? |url=https://www.vulture.com/2017/10/practical-magic-griffin-dunne-witch-curse.html |access-date=23 October 2024 |work=[[Vulture (website)|Vulture]] |date=October 26, 2017 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20181013093747/https://www.vulture.com/2017/10/practical-magic-griffin-dunne-witch-curse.html |archive-date=October 13, 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="VF" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Goldstein |first=Jessica |date=2020-10-20 |title=Stockard Channing Answers Every Question We Have About ''Practical Magic'' |url=https://www.vulture.com/2020/10/stockard-channing-answers-our-practical-magic-questions.html |access-date=2024-10-24 |website=Vulture |language=en}}</ref> Writing about ''Practical Magic''{{'}}s legacy in 2018, David Sims of ''[[The Atlantic]]'' discussed how the film centers relationships between women through the Owens bloodline as well as in the final scene involving the town's women uniting to free Gillian from Jimmy's control.<ref name="Sims">{{cite web |last=Sims |first=David |date=2018-10-16 |title=Thank the '90s for ''Practical Magic'' |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/10/practical-magic-revisited-20-years-later/573097/ |work=The Atlantic |access-date=2019-10-16 |archive-date=2019-01-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190110133657/https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/10/practical-magic-revisited-20-years-later/573097/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=Vox>{{Cite web |last=Framke |first=Caroline |date=2015-10-31 |title=The flawed but fun Practical Magic is the Thelma and Louise of witch movies |url=https://www.vox.com/2015/10/31/9647652/practical-magic-review-witches |access-date=2024-10-24 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}</ref> He described the film as a mainstream [[Major film studios|studio]] feature "that wove dark themes about gender and power into an ostensible crowd-pleasing comedy", qualities that made it unusual for its time and have contributed to its staying power.<ref name="Sims" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)