Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Quadratic formula
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===By Lagrange resolvents=== {{details|Lagrange resolvents}} An alternative way of deriving the quadratic formula is via the method of [[Lagrange resolvents]],<ref name=Clark>Clark, A. (1984). ''Elements of abstract algebra''. Courier Corporation. p. 146.</ref> which is an early part of [[Galois theory]].<ref name="efei">{{citation |title=Elliptic functions and elliptic integrals |first1=Viktor |last1=Prasolov |first2=Yuri |last2=Solovyev |publisher=AMS Bookstore |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-8218-0587-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fcp9IiZd3tQC&pg=PA134 |page=134 }}</ref> This method can be generalized to give the roots of [[cubic polynomial]]s and [[quartic polynomial]]s, and leads to Galois theory, which allows one to understand the solution of algebraic equations of any degree in terms of the [[symmetry group]] of their roots, the [[Galois group]]. This approach focuses on the roots themselves rather than algebraically rearranging the original equation. Given a monic quadratic polynomial {{tmath|\textstyle x^2 + px + q}} assume that {{tmath|\alpha}} and {{tmath|\beta}} are the two roots. So the polynomial factors as <math display=block>\begin{align} x^2+px+q &= (x-\alpha)(x-\beta) \\[3mu] &= x^2-(\alpha+\beta)x+\alpha\beta \end{align}</math> which implies {{tmath|1= p = -(\alpha + \beta)}} and {{tmath|1= q = \alpha\beta}}. Since multiplication and addition are both [[commutative property|commutative]], exchanging the roots {{tmath|\alpha}} and {{tmath|\beta}} will not change the coefficients {{tmath|p}} and {{tmath|q}}: one can say that {{tmath|p}} and {{tmath|q}} are [[symmetric polynomials]] in {{tmath|\alpha}} and {{tmath|\beta}}. Specifically, they are the [[elementary symmetric polynomials]] β any symmetric polynomial in {{tmath|\alpha}} and {{tmath|\beta}} can be expressed in terms of {{tmath|\alpha + \beta}} and {{tmath|\alpha\beta}} instead. The Galois theory approach to analyzing and solving polynomials is to ask whether, given coefficients of a polynomial each of which is a symmetric function in the roots, one can "break" the symmetry and thereby recover the roots. Using this approach, solving a polynomial of degree {{tmath|n}} is related to the ways of rearranging ("[[permutation|permuting]]") {{tmath|n}} terms, called the [[symmetric group]] on {{tmath|n}} letters and denoted {{tmath|S_n}}. For the quadratic polynomial, the only ways to rearrange two roots are to either leave them be or to [[Transposition (mathematics)|transpose]] them, so solving a quadratic polynomial is simple. To find the roots {{tmath|\alpha}} and {{tmath|\beta}}, consider their sum and difference: <math display=block> r_1 = \alpha + \beta, \quad r_2 = \alpha - \beta . </math> These are called the ''Lagrange resolvents'' of the polynomial, from which the roots can be recovered as <math display=block> \alpha = \tfrac12 (r_1 + r_2), \quad \beta = \tfrac12(r_1 - r_2). </math> Because {{tmath|1= r_1 = \alpha + \beta}} is a symmetric function in {{tmath|\alpha}} and {{tmath|\beta}}, it can be expressed in terms of {{tmath|p}} and {{tmath|q,}} specifically {{tmath|1= r_1 = -p}} as described above. However, {{tmath|1= r_2 = \alpha - \beta}} is not symmetric, since exchanging {{tmath|\alpha}} and {{tmath|\beta}} yields the additive inverse {{tmath|1= -r_2 = \beta - \alpha}}. So {{tmath|r_2}} cannot be expressed in terms of the symmetric polynomials. However, its square {{tmath|1=\textstyle r_2^2 = (\alpha - \beta)^2}} ''is'' symmetric in the roots, expressible in terms of {{tmath|p}} and {{tmath|q}}. Specifically {{tmath|1=\textstyle r_2^2 = (\alpha - \beta)^2 = {} }}{{wbr}}{{tmath|1=\textstyle (\alpha + \beta)^2 - 4\alpha\beta = {} }}{{wbr}}{{tmath|1=\textstyle p^2 - 4q}}, which implies {{tmath|1=\textstyle r_2 = \pm \sqrt{p^2 - 4q} }}. Taking the positive root "breaks" the symmetry, resulting in <math display=block> r_1 = -p, \qquad r_2 = {\textstyle \sqrt{p^2 - 4q}} </math> from which the roots {{tmath|\alpha}} and {{tmath|\beta}} are recovered as <math display=block> x = \tfrac12(r_1 \pm r_2) = \tfrac{1}{2} \bigl({-p} \pm {\textstyle \sqrt{p^2 - 4q}}\,\bigr) </math> which is the quadratic formula for a monic polynomial. Substituting {{tmath|1= p = b/a}}, {{tmath|1= q = c/a}} yields the usual expression for an arbitrary quadratic polynomial. The resolvents can be recognized as <math display=block> \tfrac12 r_1 = -\tfrac12p = -\frac{b}{2a}, \qquad r_2^2 = p_2 - 4q = \frac{b^2 - 4ac}{a^2}, </math> respectively the vertex and the discriminant of the monic polynomial. A similar but more complicated method works for [[cubic equation]]s, which have three resolvents and a quadratic equation (the "resolving polynomial") relating {{tmath|r_2}} and {{tmath|r_3}}, which one can solve by the quadratic equation, and similarly for a [[quartic equation]] ([[degree of a polynomial|degree]] 4), whose resolving polynomial is a cubic, which can in turn be solved.<ref name=Clark/> The same method for a [[quintic equation]] yields a polynomial of degree 24, which does not simplify the problem, and, in fact, solutions to quintic equations in general cannot be expressed using only roots.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)